Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8444435
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T09:23:52+00:00 2026-06-10T09:23:52+00:00

Consider the following code: >>> def default_answer(): … print Default was required! … return

  • 0

Consider the following code:

>>> def default_answer():
...     print "Default was required!"
...     return 100
... 
>>> g = { 'name': 'Jordan', 'age': 35 }
>>> result = g.get('age', default_answer())
Default was required!
>>> result = g.pop('age', default_answer())
Default was required!

Notice that whether g contains the expected key or not, default_answer is called. This makes sense programmatically but if default_answer was computationally expensive this would be a hassle (to run a lot of code to create a value that was going to be thrown away).

The only way I can think of writing this without always calling default_answer is:

result = g.pop('age', False) or default_answer()

Is this the best way to do it?

(Note that I’m aware that replacing default_answer with an object with lazy evaluation would also solve part of this problem, but that’s outside the scope of this question).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T09:23:53+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 9:23 am

    No, this is not the best way to do this, since the result of g.pop() might be “falsy”. Use try/except instead:

    try:
        result = g.pop('age')
    except KeyError:
        result = default_answer()
    

    This idiom is called EAFP and is usually preferred over LBYL for various reasons:

    1. It avoids looking up the key twice (which is not an issue with an actual dict, but might be suboptimal with other mappings).

    2. It avoids a race condition in threaded code.

    3. Many people find it easier to read.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following code: def CalcSomething(a): if CalcSomething._cache.has_key(a): return CalcSomething._cache[a] CalcSomething._cache[a] = ReallyCalc(a) return
consider the following code: class MyClass(object): def __init__(self): self.data_a = np.array(range(100)) self.data_b = np.array(range(100,200))
Consider the following example code class A: def __init__(self, i): self.i = i print("Initializing
Consider the following code: class Base(object): @classmethod def do(cls, a): print cls, a class
consider the following code if insert() return the list itself. def sieve(l): if not
Consider the following code in Python: class A(object): CLASS_ATTRIBUTE = 42 def f(self): return
Consider the following (broken) code: import functools class Foo(object): def __init__(self): def f(a,self,b): print
Consider the following python code: def function(): Docstring name = ??? doc = ???
consider the following python code: import gtk class MainWindow(): def __init__(self): self.window = gtk.Window()
Consider the following code: def create_class(class_name, superclass, &block) klass = Class.new superclass, &block Object.const_set

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.