Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8451113
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T11:09:00+00:00 2026-06-10T11:09:00+00:00

Consider the following code. int id = 666; stringstream stream(stringstream::in | stringstream::out); stream <<

  • 0

Consider the following code.

int id = 666;
stringstream stream(stringstream::in | stringstream::out);
stream << "Object " << id << " active.";
file.write(stream.str());

It combines all the values preceded by << in a string quite nicely. I would love to discover a shorter, easier to use version with less code duplication. Furthermore, the above code is just an example, and the command should accept arbitrary combinations of variables and strings. Ideally something like:

int id = 666;
WRITE("Object ", id, " active.");

Is this possible in C++ in a portable way, even with Boost.Preprocessor, inlined functions and all the bag of tricks.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T11:09:01+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 11:09 am

    If you really don’t want type-checking don’t use C++, it’s a statically-typed language!

    If you just mean you want it to work for any type, either use a macro (eurgh) or use variadic templates, something like https://gitlab.com/redistd/redistd/blob/master/include/redi/printers.h which supports:

    #include <redi/printers.h>
    using redi::println;
    int main()
    {
      int id = 666;
      println("Object ", id, " active.");  // write arguments to stdout
    }
    

    The println function takes any number of arguments and was shamelessly stolen from inspired by some example code from Howard Hinnant.

    It would be quite easy to adapt that to write to an fstream instead of std::cout e.g. by adding

    inline
    void
    fprintln()
    { file << std::endl; }
    
    template<typename T0, typename... T>
      inline
      void
      fprintln(const T0& t0, const T&... t)
      {
        print_one(file, t0);
        fprintln(t...);
      }
    

    Then:

     fprintln("Object ", id, " active.");  // write arguments to 'file'
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following C code: int c=((0xa3>>6)&0x1f)|0xc0; printf(%d\n,c); It correctly prints out 194 (
Consider the following code: int SomeField; void Foo([Pure] Func<int, object> getData) { Contract.Requires(getData !=
Consider the following code: int i = 3 << 65; I would expect that
Consider the following code: int main() { int *p; ++((int){5}); //compile without err/warning &((int){5});
Consider the following code: int main() { int i; volatile int* p = &i;
Consider the following piece of code: int i, k, m; k = 12; m
Consider the following code in C: void main() { int a=0; for(printf(\nA); a; printf(\nB));
Consider the following code: template<int* a> class base {}; int main() { base<(int*)0> test;
Consider the following code: class A { public: virtual void f() throw ( int
consider the following code: const QString& MyClass::getID(int index) const { if (i < myArraySize

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.