Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6891895
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T06:28:01+00:00 2026-05-27T06:28:01+00:00

Consider the following code that writes the same value to the same memory location

  • 0

Consider the following code that writes the same value to the same memory location from multiple threads:

void f(int* buf, int n, int* p) {
    for(int i = 0; i < n; i++)
        buf[i] = i;
    *p = buf[n/2];
}

void g(int* buf, int n) {
    int x1, x2;
    thread t1(f, buf, n, &x1);
    thread t2(f, buf, n, &x2);
    t1.join();
    t2.join();
    assert(x1 == x2);
}

Although it’s interesting, I’m of less concern of what guarantees the standard gives, since I guess it gives none. What I do care is what will be the behavior of the above code on real-world multiprocessor hardware. Will the assert always pass or there’s any chance of a race-condition, cache synchronization problems, etc..?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T06:28:02+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 6:28 am

    Memory models with regards to multi-treading concern when the effects of writes made by one thread are observable by another thread. In the code you posted both threads write the same values into the same memory location, so it doesn’t matter which thread’s write buf[n/2] reads, either will do.

    Modern processors employ cache coherency protocols, such as MESI, so when the threads write to the buffer concurrently there is going to be a lot of messages sent between the CPUs to synchronize the cache lines holding the buffer making it run much slower than in non-concurrent scenario (false sharing effect).

    Here it doesn’t matter if the writes are atomic or not, since both threads write the same values to the same memory locations. There is a race, but it doesn’t matter which thread wins because the observed values are going to be the same even with partial writes.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following code (from a requirement that says that 3 is special for
Consider the following code template<unsigned int N> void foo(std::bitset<N> bs) { /* whatever */
Consider the following code. It's an anchor tag with an id called leader-module-total that
Consider the following code: while(true) { someFunction(); Thread.sleep(1000); } What I want is that,
Consider the following code: void Handler(object o, EventArgs e) { // I swear o
Consider the following code: abstract class SomeClassX<T> { // blah } class SomeClassY: SomeClassX<int>
Consider the following code snippet private void ProcessFile(string fullPath) { XmlTextReader rdr = new
Consider the following code: writer.c mkfifo(/tmp/myfifo, 0660); int fd = open(/tmp/myfifo, O_WRONLY); char *foo,
Consider the following code: namespace DisposeTest { using System; class Program { static void
Consider the following code: try { int *i = NULL; i[100] = 20; catch

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.