Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8813841
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 14, 20262026-06-14T03:57:37+00:00 2026-06-14T03:57:37+00:00

Consider the following Generic class: public class Custom<T> where T : string { }

  • 0

Consider the following Generic class:

public class Custom<T> where T : string
{
}

This produces the following error:

‘string’ is not a valid constraint. A type used as a constraint must
be an interface, a non-sealed class or a type parameter.

Is there another way to constrain which types my generic class can use?

Also, can I constrain to multiple types?

E.G.

T can only be string, int or byte

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-14T03:57:38+00:00Added an answer on June 14, 2026 at 3:57 am
    public class Custom<T> where T : string
    

    is not allowed, because the only T that meets that is: string (string is sealed) – making it rather pointless as a generic.

    Also, can I constrain to multiple types?

    no – unless you do that at runtime via reflection rather than in a constraint (the static constructor is one way to do that – throwing an exception if used incorrectly)

    T can only be string, int or byte

    You might use something like IEquatable<T>, but that doesn’t restrict it as much as you would like, so ultimately: no.

    Something you could do is access it via an overloaded factory:

    public abstract class Custom
    {
        public static Custom Create(int value)
        { return new CustomImpl<int>(value); }
        public static Custom Create(byte value)
        { return new CustomImpl<byte>(value); }
        public static Custom Create(string value)
        { return new CustomImpl<string>(value); }
        private class CustomImpl<T> : Custom
        {
            public CustomImpl(T val) { /*...*/ }
        }
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider following 2 programs giving same error First calss: public class Testing { Testing
Consider the following code: class CustomClass { public CustomClass(string value) { m_value = value;
consider following: 1st APPROACH: public void f3() { f2(); f1(); } and this ...
Consider the following declaration of a generic utility class in Delphi 2010: TEnumerableUtils =
Consider the following code: public abstract class RepositoryBase<T> where T : class { #region
I have a question about .net generics. Consider the following code: public abstract class
Consider this small test class: import java.util.List; public abstract class Test { // CAN
Consider the following code: class Program { void Foo<T>() { } static void Main(string[]
Consider the following code: public class Outer<T> { public class Inner{ } public static
Given the following CRTP type in C#: public abstract class DataProviderBase<TProvider> where TProvider :

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.