Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 142617
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:57:54+00:00 2026-05-11T07:57:54+00:00

Consider the following main() method which you would find most iPhone applications: int main(int

  • 0

Consider the following main() method which you would find most iPhone applications:

int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {     NSAutoreleasePool *pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init];     int retVal = UIApplicationMain(argc, argv, nil, nil);     [pool release];     return retVal; }

In every iPhone app that I’ve run in Simulator with these (including several sample projects provided by Apple), the thread never exits UIApplicationMain() and any remaining code in main() is never executed. Is this expected behavior?

I have verified that statements after UIApplicationMain() never run by stepping through the code with a debugger. When the user stops an application (by hitting the ‘Home’ button, for example), the resulting stack trace shows that [UIApplication _terminateWithStatus:] is eventually called. This function calls your application delegate’s applicationWillTerminate: method. Once that finishes, [UIApplication _terminateWithStatus:] seems to kill/exit the thread.

Can someone confirm that this is how main() is supposed to work, or at least confirm the same behavior on their machine?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:57:55+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:57 am

    The original question was: ‘Why doesn’t an iPhone app’s main() function ever get a chance to finish?‘

    Short Answer: Because UIApplicationMain() is coded such that it never returns.

    After doing several tests in Simulator and on the device, and asking another developer to do the same tests, I have confirmed that UIApplicationMain never returns. When the user terminates an application normally by hitting the Home button, The program ultimately terminates inside an unpublished UIApplication method called _terminateWithStatus. This method calls exit(0).

    This behavior matches that of the NSApplicationMain function (which is AppKit/Cocoa version of the UIApplicationMain function). The documentation for NSApplicationMain() clearly states that it will never return.

    I have submitted a bug (6600198) to Apple requesting that the official documentation (and Xcode template for main.m) be corrected to state that UIApplicationMain() never returns. While this is not a functional problem, the current template and docs are misleading.

    Thanks to everyone for all the input and brainstorming!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 81k
  • Answers 81k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer setting overflow: hidden; to .break should solve the problem. IE… May 11, 2026 at 4:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Your c is a class object, it does not have… May 11, 2026 at 4:29 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The bug is in the function addNumbers. When you add… May 11, 2026 at 4:29 pm

Related Questions

I think there must be something subtle going on here that I don't know
I have a question about how python treats the methods passed to sorted(). Consider
I was of the opinion that virtualization doesnt work in the super class constructor
I have some questions on using std::map : Is using an enum as the

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.