Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 563879
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T12:42:24+00:00 2026-05-13T12:42:24+00:00

Consider the following query in PostgreSQL: SELECT a, b, (A VERY LONG AND COMPLICATED

  • 0

Consider the following query in PostgreSQL:

SELECT 
    a, b, 
   (A VERY LONG AND COMPLICATED SUBQUERY) AS c,
   (ANOTHER VERY LONG AND COMPLICATED SUBQUERY) AS d
FROM table

I want to have c and d in the WHERE clause, like:

WHERE c AND d;

But, as far as I know, I can only do:

WHERE A VERY LONG AND COMPLICATED SUBQUERY) AND 
   (ANOTHER VERY LONG AND COMPLICATED SUBQUERY)

Which is clumsy, code-replicating, breaking the single-choice principle and utterly ugly.

By the way, the same problem applies to the SELECT clause: I can not use abbreviations for previously-defined subqueries.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T12:42:24+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 12:42 pm

    You could use a subquery:

    SELECT a,b,c,d FROM
        (SELECT 
            a, b, 
            (A VERY LONG AND COMPLICATED SUBQUERY) AS c,
            (ANOTHER VERY LONG AND COMPLICATED SUBQUERY) AS d
            FROM table
        ) AS T1
    WHERE c AND d
    

    You could also do this with a CTE.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 337k
  • Answers 337k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Some things you can try out: Instead of rolling your… May 14, 2026 at 4:01 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Modify your markup: <%= Html.CreateAdminMenuLink("Home", "~/Page/Home") %> The equals sign… May 14, 2026 at 4:01 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The Authorize filter actually gets the IPrincipal for the user… May 14, 2026 at 4:01 am

Related Questions

I am trying to get the number of students enrolled in courses via a
Consider the following database tables: Table messages with 13,000,000 rows (one row per message).
I have a two tables as follows: product category(t1): id name product master(t2): id
Consider the tables: ( -> denotes a SQL defined relationship) USER (userid, username, imageid->IMAGE.imageid)
How do you exclude a set of values when using a left outer join?

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.