Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 691499
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T02:33:02+00:00 2026-05-14T02:33:02+00:00

Consider the following situation Code was added to the trunk at revision x A

  • 0

Consider the following situation

  1. Code was added to the trunk at revision x
  2. A branch was created
  3. The modifications of rev x were removed from trunk in rev x+10 and new code was added
  4. trunk and branch goes their own ways till rev x+100
  5. Now we need to update the branch with changes form the trunk

The problem with a simple “merge a range of revisions” is that due to step 3, the initial branch modifications are being removed. Is there any way to work around this without resorting to manual merge.

Version Info: TortoiseSVN 1.6.7, Build 18415 - 32 Bit , 2010/01/22 17:55:06 Subversion 1.6.9,

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T02:33:02+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 2:33 am

    If the changes from revision x were removed and new changes were made all in one commit, then there is no way to sort this out other than manually. The smallest union of changes SVN can handle is one commit.

    However, you don’t have to sort out the mess of x+10 and all the rest of the changes in one go. What you could do is a temporary branch temp of the trunk at x+9, merge x+10 into that manually sorting out the removal of x from the rest of the changes done at x+10. Then you first merge branch temp into your branch and then all the changes from (x+11) to (x+100) from the trunk, sorting out whatever problems come from that.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following situation: I'm using the Application object in ASP.NET to store a
consider the following code: #define MAX_COUNT 4 static int foo(int w[MAX_COUNT]) { int *p
Consider following snippet code for xml. <rootnode> <child id=child1 ><![CDATA[child 1]]></child> <child id=child2 ><![CDATA[child
please consider the following scenario for .net 2.0: I have an event that is
Consider following array $details = array( array('lname'=>'A', 'fname'=>'P','membkey'=>700,'head'=>'y'), array('lname'=>'B', 'fname'=>'Q','membkey'=>540,'head'=>'n'), array('lname'=>'C', 'fname'=>'R','membkey'=>700,'head'=>'n'), array('lname'=>'D', 'fname'=>'S','membkey'=>540,'head'=>'y'),
I've been running into the following case repeatedly lately, either I need to apply
Let's first consider a simple scenario ( see complete source on ideone.com ): import
I have the following class which I'm fighting over how to implement. The question
Is there a (practical) way to by-pass the normal (virtual) constructor calling order? Example:
In C++, is a const method returning a pointer to a non-const object considered

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.