Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1048719
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T16:30:10+00:00 2026-05-16T16:30:10+00:00

Consider the following snippet: void Foo() // 1 { } namespace { void Foo()

  • 0

Consider the following snippet:

void Foo() // 1
{
}

namespace
{
  void Foo() // 2
  {
  }
}

int main()
{
  Foo(); // Ambiguous.
  ::Foo(); // Calls the Foo in the global namespace (Foo #1).

  // I'm trying to call the `Foo` that's defined in the anonymous namespace (Foo #2).
}

How can I refer to something inside an anonymous namespace in this case?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T16:30:11+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 4:30 pm

    You can’t. The standard contains the following section (§7.3.1.1, C++03):

    An unnamed-namespace-definition behaves as if it were replaced by

      namespace unique { /* empty body */ }
      using namespace unique;
      namespace unique { namespace-body }
    

    where all occurrences of unique in a
    translation unit are replaced by the
    same identifier and this identifier
    differs from all other identifiers in the entire program.

    Thus you have no way to refer to that unique name.

    You could however technically use something like the following instead:

    int i;
    
    namespace helper {
        namespace {
            int i;
            int j;
        }
    }
    
    using namespace helper;
    
    void f() { 
        j++; // works
        i++; // still ambigous
        ::i++; // access to global namespace
        helper::i++; // access to unnamed namespace        
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following code snippet: #include <vector> using namespace std; void sub(vector<int>& vec) {
Consider the following short code snippet. namespace B { public class Foo { public
Consider the following snippet: void Foo() { // ... } void Bar() { return
Consider the following snippet: public class ReflectionTest { public static void main(String[] args) {
Consider the following snippet: import java.util.*; public class EqualsOverload { public static void main(String[]
Let's consider the following code snippet void Test() { int x = 0; int&
Consider the following snippet: struct Base { virtual ~Base() {} virtual void Foo() const
Consider the following snippet: class Foo { public: Foo( int Value ); // other
Consider the following snippet (error handling missing on purpose): void* foo(const char *path, off_t
Consider the following code snippet: #include <iostream> using namespace std; struct Element { void

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.