Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1023645
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T11:39:25+00:00 2026-05-16T11:39:25+00:00

Consider the following: var o = new { Foo = foo, Bar = bar

  • 0

Consider the following:

var o = new { Foo = "foo", Bar = "bar" };

This instance is read-only, since the anonymous type doesn’t implement setters like a class does:

public class O
{
    public String Foo { get; set; }
    public String Bar { get; set; }
}

Is it possible to “open up” the anonymous instance and allow it’s properties to be altered? Preferably in fewer characters than it would take to create a class.

I’m thinking perhaps this can be done with an extension method on Object; o.SetProperty(o.Foo, "foo!");, if you can’t implement setters in-line at the construction of the object.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T11:39:26+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 11:39 am

    Anonymous types are immutable by design, so there’s no way you can change their state. You could use reflection (as Mark Gravell pointed out correctly) but neither is this desirable performance wise nor from a design perspective.

    You’ve got multiple options to work around this:

    • Use Tuples instead of annonymous types. Note that they are immutable too but you can work with them more easily to create methods like tupleA.WithItem2(newValueForItem2). Similar to the string class.
    • write your own “named” type using auto properties, usually straightforward
    • use a refactoring tool like CodeRush that can generate a “named” type from your usage
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider the following criteria query: var x = SomeCriteria.AddOrder(new Order(Name, true)).List(); This will order
Consider the following code: class Foo(var name: String = bar) Now i try to
Consider the following example: <html> <body> <script type=text/javascript> var str=filename.jpg; var pattOne = new
Lets consider the following linq statement. var ctx = new MoviesContext(); var movies =
Consider the following JavaScript: for (var i = 0; i < foo.length; i++) {
Consider the following code: var Widget = new Class({ Implements: [Options], options: { name
Consider the following unit test: [TestMethod] public void TestByteToString() { var guid = new
I'm trying to learn C#'s restrictions on an anonymous type. Consider the following code:
Consider the following code: function Dog() { this.foo = function() {}; this.walk = function()
Consider the following example: HTML: <div id=cool-div></div> JS/jQuery: var ComplexObject = function() { this.Append

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.