Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8502711
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T01:33:39+00:00 2026-06-11T01:33:39+00:00

Consider these two classes: class A(object): name = A class B(A): name = Child

  • 0

Consider these two classes:

class A(object):
    name = "A"

class B(A):
    name = "Child of " + A.name

Simple. A.name will be “A” and B.name will be “Child of A”.

But it seems wrong to hard code A.name into B‘s definition of name. I naturally want to write something like:

class B(A):
    name = "Child of " + super(B).name

But that raises a NameError with B not yet being defined in the expression super(B). (Also, I’m not sure whether it should/would be super(B) or super(B, B) or something else, but that’s a moot point given the NameError.)

What’s the right way to do this, i.e. use super in the definition of a class attribute?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T01:33:41+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 1:33 am

    It can’t be done inside the class definition, for the reason you discovered: inside the class definition, you don’t have access to the class itself, since it’s not defined yet.

    You can do it with a class decorator, though (if you’re using a version of Python with class decorators, which I think is 2.6 and up):

    >>> class A(object):
    ...     name = "A"
    >>> def makeAttr(cls):
    ...     cls.name = "Child of " + super(cls, cls).name
    ...     return cls
    >>> @makeAttr
    ... class B(A):
    ...     name = "B"
    >>> B.name
    'Child of A'
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Consider these two classes: public class A { B b; public A(B b) {
Consider these two classes mapped to the same table. One is readonly via mutable=false.
Consider these 2 pieces of code (you can assume execeptionObj is of type Object
To give an idea of my requirement, consider these classes - class A {
Consider the two classes: public class Point { public int x; public int y;
Consider these two abstract classes. MyClass2 extends my BaseClass and overrides a virtual method.
I ran across a compilation issue today that baffled me. Consider these two container
Consider these pseudo models: class BaseProduct: quantity_available = Integer class Box(BaseProduct): items_in_box = Integer
Consider, I have the following 3 classes / interfaces: class MyClass<T> { } interface
Consider a beginner dealing with Dependency Injection. We're analyzing two relevant classes in NerdDinner.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.