Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 212189
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T18:09:50+00:00 2026-05-11T18:09:50+00:00

Consider this – a base class A, class B inheriting from A, class C

  • 0

Consider this – a base class A, class B inheriting from A, class C inheriting from B. What is a generic way to call a parent class initialiser in an initialiser? If this still sounds too vague, here’s some code.

class A(object):
    def __init__(self):
        print "Initialiser A was called"

class B(A):
    def __init__(self):
        super(B,self).__init__()
        print "Initialiser B was called"

class C(B):
    def __init__(self):
        super(C,self).__init__()
        print "Initialiser C was called"

c = C()

This is how I do it now. But it still seems a bit too non-generic – you still must pass a correct type by hand.

Now, I’ve tried using self.__class__ as a first argument to super(), but, obviously it doesn’t work – if you put it in the initialiser for C – fair enough, B’s initialiser gets called. If you do the same in B, “self” still points to an instance of C so you end up calling B’s initialiser again (this ends in an infinite recursion).

There is no need to think about diamond inheritance for now, I am just interested in solving this specific problem.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T18:09:51+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 6:09 pm

    The way you are doing it is indeed the recommended one (for Python 2.x).

    The issue of whether the class is passed explicitly to super is a matter of style rather than functionality. Passing the class to super fits in with Python’s philosophy of “explicit is better than implicit”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 115k
  • Answers 115k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer $filepath = $path . DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR . $file; Although in newer… May 11, 2026 at 10:26 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The scopes refer to the 'feature scope level'. Feature scope… May 11, 2026 at 10:26 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try something like this in the parent: <set name="childs" inverse="true"… May 11, 2026 at 10:26 pm

Related Questions

Consider this problem: I have a program which should fetch (let's say) 100 records
Consider this code... using System.Threading; //... Timer someWork = new Timer( delegate(object state) {
Consider this case: dll = LoadDLL() dll->do() ... void do() { char *a =
Consider this Python program which uses PyGtk and Hippo Canvas to display a clickable
Consider this: public class TestClass { private String a; private String b; public TestClass()

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.