Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 801227
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 14, 20262026-05-14T23:24:36+00:00 2026-05-14T23:24:36+00:00

Consider this example: applyKTimes :: Integral i => i -> (a -> a) ->

  • 0

Consider this example:

applyKTimes :: Integral i => i -> (a -> a) -> a -> a
applyKTimes 0 _ x = x
applyKTimes k f x = applyKTimes (k-1) f (f x)

applyThrice :: (a -> a) -> a -> a
applyThrice = applyKTimes 3

The 3 in applyThrice is defaulted by GHC to an Integer as shown when compiling with -Wall:

Warning: Defaulting the following constraint(s) to type 'Integer'
         'Integral t'
           arising from a use of 'applyKTimes'

So I guess that Integer is the default Integral a => a.

  • Is there a way to define “default types” for other constraints too?
  • Is using default types bad practice? (it does complain when using -Wall..)
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-14T23:24:37+00:00Added an answer on May 14, 2026 at 11:24 pm

    Yes, you can, although it’s not quite so simple as adding a default per typeclass, and it only works for Num and its subclasses in the Prelude and standard libraries. The syntax is default (t1, ..., tn), and only one such declaration can be used per module.

    Adding default (Int), for example, would change the default for Integral in your code to Int.

    The default default of (Integer, Double) isn’t just a GHC policy: it’s from the Haskell 98 Report. (GHCi does have extended default rules, though.)

    Here’s a discussion of some of the problems with the current system.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 484k
  • Answers 484k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The short answer is NO. It seems like after all… May 16, 2026 at 7:27 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Try flushing and disposing or even better simplify your code… May 16, 2026 at 7:27 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You are looking for the disable-output-escaping attribute to xsl:value-of <xsl:value-of… May 16, 2026 at 7:27 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.