Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 37061
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T14:29:30+00:00 2026-05-10T14:29:30+00:00

Considering such code: class ToBeTested { public: void doForEach() { for (vector<Contained>::iterator it =

  • 0

Considering such code:

class ToBeTested { public:   void doForEach() {     for (vector<Contained>::iterator it = m_contained.begin(); it != m_contained.end(); it++) {        doOnce(*it);        doTwice(*it);        doTwice(*it);     }   }   void doOnce(Contained & c) {     // do something   }   void doTwice(Contained & c) {     // do something   }    // other methods private:   vector<Contained> m_contained; } 

I want to test that if I fill vector with 3 values my functions will be called in proper order and quantity. For example my test can look something like this:

tobeTested.AddContained(one); tobeTested.AddContained(two); tobeTested.AddContained(three);  BEGIN_PROC_TEST() SHOULD_BE_CALLED(doOnce, 1) SHOULD_BE_CALLED(doTwice, 2) SHOULD_BE_CALLED(doOnce, 1) SHOULD_BE_CALLED(doTwice, 2) SHOULD_BE_CALLED(doOnce, 1) SHOULD_BE_CALLED(doTwice, 2)  tobeTested.doForEach() END_PROC_TEST() 

How do you recommend to test this? Are there any means to do this with CppUnit or GoogleTest frameworks? Maybe some other unit test framework allow to perform such tests?

I understand that probably this is impossible without calling any debug functions from these functions, but at least can it be done automatically in some test framework. I don’t like to scan trace logs and check their correctness.

UPD: I’m trying to check not only the state of an objects, but also the execution order to avoid performance issues on the earliest possible stage (and in general I want to know that my code is executed exactly as I expected).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T14:29:30+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 2:29 pm

    If you’re interested in performance, I recommend that you write a test that measures performance.

    Check the current time, run the method you’re concerned about, then check the time again. Assert that the total time taken is less than some value.

    The problem with check that methods are called in a certain order is that your code is going to have to change, and you don’t want to have to update your tests when that happens. You should focus on testing the actual requirement instead of testing the implementation detail that meets that requirement.

    That said, if you really want to test that your methods are called in a certain order, you’ll need to do the following:

    1. Move them to another class, call it Collaborator
    2. Add an instance of this other class to the ToBeTested class
    3. Use a mocking framework to set the instance variable on ToBeTested to be a mock of the Collborator class
    4. Call the method under test
    5. Use your mocking framework to assert that the methods were called on your mock in the correct order.

    I’m not a native cpp speaker so I can’t comment on which mocking framework you should use, but I see some other commenters have added their suggestions on this front.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 113k
  • Answers 113k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer You could fix the value of gnus-auto-subscribed-groups so that it… May 11, 2026 at 10:03 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer This is fixed in version 2.2 - I would suggest… May 11, 2026 at 10:03 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The code snippet example in this link pretty much does… May 11, 2026 at 10:03 pm

Related Questions

I'm currently in the middle of porting a fairly large Perl The problem is
I've recently started using code coverage tools (particularily Emma and EclEmma), and I really
Is there a way to enforce/limit the types that are passed to primitives? (bool,
I am working on the billing component of a Ruby on Rails application using

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.