Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 164277
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T11:42:56+00:00 2026-05-11T11:42:56+00:00

const int MIN_NUMBER = 4; class Temp { public: Temp(int x) : X(x) {

  • 0
const int MIN_NUMBER = 4; class Temp { public:      Temp(int x) : X(x)     {     }      bool getX() const     {         try         {             if( X < MIN_NUMBER)             {                 //By mistake throwing any specific exception was missed out                 //Program terminated here                 throw ;             }         }         catch (bool bTemp)         {             cout<<'catch(bool) exception';          }         catch(...)         {             cout<<'catch... exception';         }         return X;     }  private:     int X; };    int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {     Temp *pTemp = NULL;     try     {         pTemp = new Temp(3);         int nX = pTemp->getX();         delete pTemp;     }     catch(...)     {         cout<<'cought exception';     }      cout<<'success';     return 0; } 

In above code, throw false was intended in getX() method but due to a human error(!) false was missed out. The innocent looking code crashed the application.

My question is why does program gets terminated when we throw ‘nothing”?

I have little understanding that throw; is basically ‘rethrow’ and must be used in exception handler (catch). Using this concept in any other place would results into program termination then why does compiler not raise flags during compilation?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T11:42:57+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 11:42 am

    This is expected behaviour. From the C++ standard:

    If no exception is presently being handled, executing a throw-expression with no operand calls terminate()(15.5.1).

    As to why the compiler can’t diagnose this, it would take some pretty sophisticated flow analysis to do so and I guess the compiler writers would not judge it as cost-effective. C++ (and other languages) are full of possible errors that could in theory be caught by the compiler but in practice are not.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a private const int defined in a C# class. I want compilation
Consider: int testfunc1 (const int a) { return a; } int testfunc2 (int const
private const int THE_ANSWER = 42; or private const int theAnswer = 42; Personally
when doing like this: const int a = 5; I wonder if a will
I know that static const int x = 42; at namespace scope is equivalent
This compiles: int* p1; const int* p2; p2 = p1; This does not: vector<int*>
I wrote my comparison function int cmp(const int * a,const int * b) {
void DoWork(int n); void DoWork(const int &n); What's the difference?
I'm a bit confused what happened in the following code: const int e =
I've often used pointers to const objects, like so... const int *p; That simply

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.