Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8550637
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 11, 20262026-06-11T13:59:43+00:00 2026-06-11T13:59:43+00:00

Context I am writing a simple JUnit test for the MyObject class. A MyObject

  • 0

Context

I am writing a simple JUnit test for the MyObject class.

A MyObject can be created from a static factory method that takes a varargs of String.

MyObject.ofComponents("Uno", "Dos", "Tres");

At any time during the existence of MyObject, clients can inspect the parameters it was created by in the form of a List<E>, through the .getComponents() method.

myObject.ofComponents(); // -> List<String>: { "Uno", "Dos", "Tres" }

In other words, a MyObject both remembers and exposes the list of parameters that brought it into existence. More details about this contract:

  • The order of getComponents will be the same as the one chosen for object creation
  • Duplicate subsequent String components are allowed and retained in order
  • Behaviour on null is undefined (other code guarantees no null gets to the factory)
  • There are no ways to alter the list of components after object instantiation

I am writing a simple test that creates a MyObject from a list of String and checks that it can return the same list via .getComponents(). I do this immediately but this is supposed to happen at a distance in a realistic code path.

Code

Here my attempt:


List<String> argumentComponents = Lists.newArrayList("One", "Two", "Three");
List<String> returnedComponents =
    MyObject.ofComponents(
        argumentComponents.toArray(new String[argumentComponents.size()]))
        .getComponents();
assertTrue(Iterables.elementsEqual(argumentComponents, returnedComponents));

Question

  • Is Google Guava Iterables.elementsEqual() the best way, provided I have the library in my build path, to compare those two lists? this is something I have been agonizing about; should I use this helper method which goes over an Iterable<E>.. check size and then iterate running .equals().. or any other of the methods that an Internet search suggests? what’s the canonical way to compare lists for unit tests?

Optional insights I would love to get

  • Is the method test designed reasonably? I am not an expert in JUnit!
  • Is .toArray() the best way to convert a List<E> to a varargs of E?
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-11T13:59:44+00:00Added an answer on June 11, 2026 at 1:59 pm

    I prefer using Hamcrest because it gives much better output in case of a failure

    Assert.assertThat(listUnderTest, 
           IsIterableContainingInOrder.contains(expectedList.toArray()));
    

    Instead of reporting

    expected true, got false

    it will report

    expected List containing "1, 2, 3, ..." got list containing "4, 6, 2, ..."

    IsIterableContainingInOrder.contain

    Hamcrest

    According to the Javadoc:

    Creates a matcher for Iterables that matches when a single pass over the examined Iterable yields a series of items, each logically equal to the corresponding item in the specified items. For a positive match, the examined iterable must be of the same length as the number of specified items

    So the listUnderTest must have the same number of elements and each element must match the expected values in order.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

In context - I'm writing a simple, standalone config file parser for a class
I am writing an event delegating plugin that takes 4 params: context = String
I have a Java Project in which I am writing a simple JUNIT test
I am writing a custom c# HttpModule that will handle requests from all file
BACKGROUND I'm writing a method that will (eventually) take as input a System.Data.DataTable and
I'm writing a simple bean that I want to configure with a table name,
I'm writing an application updater that pulls installation package from our distribution web site
I'm writing a simple AJAX call that returns a full HTML page and then
I'm writing a (very) simple Visual Studio addin. Two things that would make it
I am currently writing a custom context menu class which utilizes jQuery largely. We

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.