Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Could anyone explain the implications of storing strings into a column that is defined as nvarchar(max) instead of defining the length of say nvarchar(500)? The table would contain multiple fields and could have the potential of containing 10million+ records. These fields would also not be indexed.
Thanks!
It being indexed or not comes into play when you’re trying to search on that data. So, if it’s data that just comes along for the ride when you query on other fields, then it shouldn’t be too bad. There’s a little more to it (i.e. covering indexes), but that’s the basic gist of it.