Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 138917

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:20:31+00:00 2026-05-11T07:20:31+00:00

Could somebody please explain this piece of Ruby code: def add_spec_path_to(args) # :nodoc: args

  • 0

Could somebody please explain this piece of Ruby code:

def add_spec_path_to(args) # :nodoc:   args << {} unless Hash === args.last   args.last[:spec_path] ||= caller(0)[2] end 

I have seen the << operator used for concatenation strings or as a bitwise operator in other languages but could somebody explain it in this context. Is it somehow appending a blank lamda onto args or am I totally wrong?

I can also see it used like this:

before_parts(*args) << block 

Is the Hash a keyword?

I am also unsure of what the ||= operator is saying.

I am equally in the dark as to what caller(0)[2] is.

  • 0 0 Answers
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:20:32+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:20 am

    ||= is a common Ruby idiom: it assigns the value only if it is not already set. The effect is the same as code like

    if some_variable == nil    some_variable = some_value end 

    or

    some_variable= some_value unless some_variable 

    ===, when not overridden, compares two objects for identity. In the case of Hash === args.last, Hash (which is an object of type Class) is checking to see if it matches the class of the last item in the args Array. The code is making use of the apparent fact that the implementation of Class#=== forces a check on the class of the compared object.

    It doesn’t work the other way around, for example:

    a = [{}] Hash === a.last #=> true a.last === Hash #=> false 

    The trailing arguments to a method may be supplied as the contents of a hash without needing to provide the {}

    So you can do this:

    def hello(arg1, arg2, arg3)   puts [arg1.class, arg2.class, arg3.class].join(',') end  hello 1,2,3 #=> Fixnum,Fixnum,Fixnum hello :a, 'b', :c => 1, :d => 99 #=> Symbol,String,Hash 

    It’s often used to provide a variable-length list of optional parameters to the function.

    Are you sure you transcribed the original code precisely, btw? In order to get an array of arguments, you would normally add an * to the argument as declared, otherwise args would have to be input as an array, whcih would rather defeat the object.

    def add_spec_path_to(*args)              # now args is an array     args << {} unless Hash === args.last # if trailing arguments cannot be                                          # interpreted as a Hash, add an empty                                           # Hash here so that following code will                                           # not fail     args.last[:spec_path] ||= caller(0)[2] # Set the spec_path option if it's not                                          # already set end 

    EDIT: Expanding further on the *args thing, try this:

    def x(*args)   puts args.join(',')   puts args.map{|a| a.class }.join(',') end  x 1,2,:a=>5,:b=>6  1,2,a5b6 Fixnum,Fixnum,Hash 

    … using *args causes args to be presented to the method as an array. If I don’t use the *, like this, for example:

    def y(args)   puts args.join(',')   puts args.map{|a| a.class }.join(',') end 

    … then args has to be an array before I call the method, or I’ll get an ‘ArgumentError: wrong number of arguments’ for anything but one thing passed. So it has to look like this:

    y [1,2,{:c=>3,:d=>4}] 

    …with the Hash explicitly created with {}. And it’s ugly.

    All the above tested with MRI 1.8.6, btw.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 109k
  • Answers 109k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer No database shows up because you have to create one.… May 11, 2026 at 9:27 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer IEnumberable<T> is read-only, you have to reconstruct the collection to… May 11, 2026 at 9:27 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer It's a bug May 11, 2026 at 9:27 pm

Related Questions

Could somebody please explain to me what happens here? I am creating a binding
I have a char array buffer that I am using to store characters that
I've experienced rather strange behavior of JSTL forEach tag. I have some bean called
The basics: I have a contact form that uses php to validate the forms.

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.