Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8732457
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T09:26:39+00:00 2026-06-13T09:26:39+00:00

Could someone explain and provide real world examples of using with keyword in defining

  • 0

Could someone explain and provide real world examples of using with keyword in defining types?

Let’s define type

type T = A with B

What does it mean?
When should it be used?
How to instantiate type T?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T09:26:40+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 9:26 am

    I guess it’s called type conjunction.

    You can use it to enforce that a certain type must extend all of the specified traits / classes. A stupid example:

    scala> trait Quackable {
         |   def quack = println("quack")
         | }
    defined trait Quackable
    
    scala> trait Walkable {
         |   def walk = println("walk")
         | }
    defined trait Walkable
    
    scala> case class Duck(name: String) extends Quackable with Walkable
    defined class Duck
    
    scala> def foo(d: Quackable with Walkable): Unit = {
         |   d.quack
         |   d.walk
         | }
    foo: (d: Quackable with Walkable)Unit
    
    scala> foo(Duck(""))
    quack
    walk
    
    // Or you can create a type alias and use it.    
    scala> type QW = Quackable with Walkable
    defined type alias QW
    
    scala> def foo(d: QW): Unit = {
         |   d.quack
         |   d.walk
         | }
    foo: (d: QW)Unit
    
    scala> foo(Duck(""))
    quack
    walk
    
    // If you need to retain the type information for some reason, you can use a type parameter.
    
    scala> def foo[A <: Quackable with Walkable](d: A): A = {
         |   d.quack
         |   d.walk
         |   d
         | }
    foo: [A <: Quackable with Walkable](d: A)A
    
    scala> foo(Duck(""))
    quack
    walk
    res1: Duck = Duck()
    

    As for “how to instantiate it”: don’t think of it that way. type creates type aliases / synonyms / functions, which do not necessarily represent concrete instantiable types.

    Edit:

    If you’re familiar with Java, with as used above is similar to Java’s &.

    public static <QW extends Quackable & Walkable> void foo(QW d) {
      d.quack();
      d.walk();
    }
    

    However unlike Java’s &, with gives you a proper type. The first definition of foo I wrote cannot be translated to Java. Also you cannot do the following with Java’s &.

    scala> case object Quackawalkasaurus extends Quackable with Walkable
    defined module Quackawalkasaurus
    
    scala> List(Duck(""), Quackawalkasaurus)
    res2: List[Product with Serializable with Quackable with Walkable] = List(Duck(), Quackawalkasaurus)
    
    // Add an explicit type annotation if you want to remove unwanted common super-traits/classes.
    scala> List(Duck(""), Quackawalkasaurus) : List[Quackable with Walkable]
    res3: List[Quackable with Walkable] = List(Duck(), Quackawalkasaurus)
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Could someone explain ASP.NET Convention Based Naming and provide some examples if possible please
Could someone explain in layman terms what this actually does? XmlTextReader textReader = new
Please could someone explain to me why this regex does not match anything, when
Could someone explain the difference between the Copy Bundle Resources phase of Xcode and
Could someone explain what I am doing wrong with my classes that my JTabbedPane
Could someone explain to me how can I run my py2exe program, a console
Could someone explain this (strange) behavior? Why is the length in the first example
Could someone explain to me what this portion of code means? repeat scroll 0
I'm rather new to these could someone explain the significance (of the following code)
please, could someone explain to me a few basic things about working with languages

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.