Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Could someone explain why I would use one of these endpoint annotations over the other in spring-ws? In particular, which one would be considered the most inclusive? Can I use all three? I’ve read the doc and I know that @Action uses ws-addressing and @SoapAction uses the SOAP Action transport header, but I’m not really sure which of these would be preferable to use.
Thanks.
Depending on your message design you should use the kind of mapping that better fits:
The most common case is the use of @PayloadRoot. When you follow a document-style web service design, the fully qualified name of a message is enough to determine how it will be processed, and each document requires a different kind of processing.
In case you have multiple elements that are processed in the same way, you can use the same action (SOAP or WS-addressing) for the and redirect them to the same endpoint.