Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 4561634
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 21, 20262026-05-21T18:06:08+00:00 2026-05-21T18:06:08+00:00

Could you propose any workarounds to implement a reference to variable using closures or

  • 0

Could you propose any workarounds to implement a reference to variable using closures or any other tricks?

createReference = function() {
    // TODO: how to implement?
};

var x = 5;
var refX = createReference(x); // could be any parameters needed to implement the logic
x = 6;
alert(refX()); // should alert 6

What about passing context as first argument and pass variable name (as string) and later somehow evaluate that reference in predefined context. Is this feasible?

Here’s a more complete scenario:

createReference = function(context, prop) {
    return function() {
        return context[prop];
    };
};

Provider = function() {
};
Provider.prototype.x = 5;
Provider.prototype.getXRef = function() {
    return createReference(this, 'x');
};
Provider.prototype.incrementX = function() {
    this.x = this.x + 1;
};

var provider = new Provider();
var refX = provider.getXRef();
provider.incrementX();
alert(refX());
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-21T18:06:08+00:00Added an answer on May 21, 2026 at 6:06 pm

    You have to use a string of the variable name but I think this is as close as you’ll ever get in JavaScript:

    var createReference = function (context, prop) {
      return function () { return context[prop]; };
    };
    
    var x = 5;
    var refX = createReference(this, 'x');
    x = 6;
    
    alert(refX()); // alerts 6
    

    Edit:

    In your updated scenario it would be better to use a closure directly, so that you don’t have to use a string of the variable name:

    var createReference = function (context, func) {
        return function () { return func.call(context); }
    };
    
    Provider = function() {
    };
    Provider.prototype.x = 5;
    Provider.prototype.getXRef = function() {
    
        return createReference(this, function () { return this.x; });
    
        // OR if you happen to be running in a 
        // JavaScript 1.8 environment like Firefox 3+,
        // you can use "expression closures" for more
        // concise code:
    
        // return createReference(this, function () this.x);
    };
    Provider.prototype.incrementX = function() {
        this.x = this.x + 1;
    };
    
    var provider = new Provider();
    var refX = provider.getXRef();
    provider.incrementX();
    alert(refX()); // alerts 6
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Problem in short: How could one implement static if functionality, proposed in c++11, in
Could you help to calculate the number of each variable where each variable =1?
Could someone know where is saved path to external XML-File that contain configuration for
Could anyone guide me in created a simple app in JS? What the app
Could someone please tell me why this <%= destroy_password_url @user.password_reset_token %> generates http://localhost:3000/api/destroy_password.4G5EoRVYMUAtiIKqOerKsw routes.rb
Could this be done with javascript/jQuery : <div class=number>99,123,123</div> <div class=number>123,123,123</div> <div class=number>1,123,123,123</div> <div
Could someone please suggest why this is happening... I’ve got some code to pretty
could somebody please take a look at this http://jsfiddle.net/bloodygeese/EzkFR/1/ My aim is to on
Could someone help me to add A-atype B-btype C-ctype ONLY as a legend to
Could someone provide a sample implementation for rotating a button on a thread ?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.