Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 5982791
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 22, 20262026-05-22T22:08:15+00:00 2026-05-22T22:08:15+00:00

cppcheck has determined that the following statement produces a syntax error in sqlite3.c: for(i=0;

  • 0

cppcheck has determined that the following statement produces a syntax error in sqlite3.c:

for(i=0; i<db->nDb; i++){

Full function:

SQLITE_PRIVATE void sqlite3BtreeLeaveAll(sqlite3 *db){
  int i;
  Btree *p;
  assert( sqlite3_mutex_held(db->mutex) );
  for(i=0; i<db->nDb; i++){
    p = db->aDb[i].pBt;
    if( p && p->sharable ){
      assert( p->wantToLock>0 );
      p->wantToLock--;
      if( p->wantToLock==0 ){
        unlockBtreeMutex(p);
      }
    }
  }
 }

I do not see how it is a syntax error. Please explain. Is this a false positive?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-22T22:08:15+00:00Added an answer on May 22, 2026 at 10:08 pm

    Looks like a false positive, however I can’t reproduce it using Cppcheck 1.48 and C source code for SQLite 3.7.6.3.

    If you’re using different source or a different version, please log it as a bug.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

The Cppcheck website tells me that Code::Blocks has Cppcheck built in. The Wikipedia page
running CppCheck over my codebase produces some style warnings. E.g. in void foo(int& x)
I have the following script that I run as a custom build step in
Consider the following code : void ListenerImpl::attach(boost::shared_ptr<ISubscriber> subscriber) { boost::unique_lock<boost::mutex>(mtx); subscribers.push_back(subscriber); } void ListenerImpl::notify(MsgPtr
I have downloaded cppcheck tool and build it. Now am facing the problem that
Cppcheck shows the following warning for scanf: Message: scanf without field width limits can
I would like to use Cppcheck for static code analysis of my C++ code.
I ran across the error Socket operation on non-socket in some of my networking
Java has some very good open source static analysis tools such as FindBugs ,
I'm curious if anyone else has a good recommendation for a Qt friendly toolchain.

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.