Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 70763
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 10, 20262026-05-10T19:46:55+00:00 2026-05-10T19:46:55+00:00

currently, I am looking deeper into testing techniques, even though I am not sure

  • 0

currently, I am looking deeper into testing techniques, even though I am not sure if I still reside in the unittest-land or left it into the land of integration tests already.

Let me elaborate a bit, Given two components A and B and A uses B, then we have a certain ‘upwards-contract’ for B and a certain ‘downwards-contract’ for A. Basically this means: If A uses B correctly and B behaves correctly, then both contracts will be fulfilled and things will work correctly.

I think mocks are a way to guarantee a subset of an upwards-contract that is required for a given testcase. For example, a database connection might have the upwards contract to retrieve data records if they have been inserted earlier. A database connection mock guarantees to return certain records, without requiring their insertion into the database.

However, I am currently wondering if there is a way to verify the downwards-contract as well. Given the example of the database connection, the downwards-contract might be: You must connect to the database and ensure the connection exists and works and enter correct SQL-Queries.

Does anyone do something like this? Is this worth the work for more complicated contracts? (For example, the database connection might require an SQL-parser in order to completely verify calls to the database layer)

Greetings, tetha

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 1 View
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-10T19:46:56+00:00Added an answer on May 10, 2026 at 7:46 pm

    This is really the difference between mocks and stubs – mocks verify exactly that (or at least can do so – you can use mocks as stubs with most frameworks). Essentially, mocks allows you to do protocol testing rather than just ‘if you call X I’ll give you Y’. Every mocking framework I’ve used allows you to easily verify things like ‘all these calls were made’ and ‘these calls happened in a particular order’.

    The more protocol you enforce between components, the more brittle the tests will be – sometimes that’s entirely appropriate (e.g. ‘you must authenticate before you perform any other operations’) but it’s easy to end up with tests which have to be changed every time you change the implementation, even in a reasonable way.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I was currently looking into memcached as way to coordinate a group of server,
Currently looking into learn new technology and silverlight is on the potential list. However,
Currently looking into distributed memory cache solutions, such as Memcached and Microsoft's AppFabric caching.
Update: Currently looking into NSSET's minusSet links: Comparing Two Arrays Hi guys, Could benefit
I'm currently looking at the Python framework Django for future db-based web apps as
We are currently looking to adopt some type of standard developer framework and have
I'm currently looking for ways to create automated tests for a JAX-RS (Java API
I am currently looking at different ORM solutions for a project that is planned
I'm currently looking at indexing an ASP website from Sharepoint and I need to
I'm currently looking for a possibility in Java to identify a font as symbolic

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.