Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9142009
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 17, 20262026-06-17T09:43:14+00:00 2026-06-17T09:43:14+00:00

Currently I am using Bitbucket to store the files and branches in Git. Unfortunately,

  • 0

Currently I am using Bitbucket to store the files and branches in Git. Unfortunately, I seem to keep reassociating existing branches with new branches, so where below only the top one should be on the feature/availabilityfix branch, instead it has also associated all the ones below which were/still are on the feature/searchfix branch.

Is it possible to disassociate all those ones from the feature/availabilityfix branch from this other one? I’m completely confused by it!

Also when I merged the previous feature branch back into develop, it has now put that on as a branch for those files. Is that the correct way of dealing with files when merging?

enter image description here

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-17T09:43:15+00:00Added an answer on June 17, 2026 at 9:43 am

    A commit is not “associated” with a branch, it is contained in one (or multiple).

    Lets assume you have one branch “develop” which contains commit A. Commit A added file “foo.txt”. You now create a new branch “featureX” based on the latest commit in “develop”.

    Commit A is now contained in the branches “develop” and “featureX”. If that wouldn’t be the case, branch “featureX” wouldn’t contain the file “foo.txt”.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am currently using BitBucket's git system to manage my repositories. I see my
I deleted a file using git rm test and currently this is the output
I have my project on bitbucket using Git. I want to work on this
Currently using a MySQL database Wanting to insert a new row into a table
I am using Git Extensions with Visual Studio 2010. My repository is on Bitbucket
I'm currently writing an iPhone app and hosting my source on a BitBucket git
Currently using Gettext on a project and the .po files are nicely kept under
I'm currently using Bitbucket for my Mercurial repositories and it's working great. I would
I currently test my CodeIgniter app with phpunit by using CIUnit (https://bitbucket.org/kenjis/my-ciunit). The problem
Currently using solrServer = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(serverUrl); and with these jars.. apache-solr-core-3.6.0 apache-solr-solrj-3.6.0 commons-codec-1.6 commons-httpclient-3.1

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.