Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8785989
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 13, 20262026-06-13T21:29:39+00:00 2026-06-13T21:29:39+00:00

Currently, I have some code like this import numpy as np ret = np.array([])

  • 0

Currently, I have some code like this

import numpy as np
ret = np.array([])
for i in range(100000):
  tmp =  get_input(i)
  ret = np.append(ret, np.zeros(len(tmp)))
  ret = np.append(ret, np.ones(fixed_length))

I think this code is not efficient as np.append needs to return a copy of the array instead of modify the ret in-place

I was wondering whether I can use the extend for a numpy array like this:

import numpy as np
from somewhere import np_extend
ret = np.array([])
for i in range(100000):
  tmp =  get_input(i)
  np_extend(ret, np.zeros(len(tmp)))
  np_extend(ret, np.ones(fixed_length))

So that the extend would be much more efficient.
Does anyone have ideas about this?
Thanks!

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-13T21:29:41+00:00Added an answer on June 13, 2026 at 9:29 pm

    Imagine a numpy array as occupying one contiguous block of memory. Now imagine other objects, say other numpy arrays, which are occupying the memory just to the left and right of our numpy array. There would be no room to append to or extend our numpy array. The underlying data in a numpy array always occupies a contiguous block of memory.

    So any request to append to or extend our numpy array can only be satisfied by allocating a whole new larger block of memory, copying the old data into the new block and then appending or extending.

    So:

    1. It will not occur in-place.
    2. It will not be efficient.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some problems using asyncore with AF_UNIX sockets. This code import asyncore, socket,
I currently have my Django custom template filter like this: from django import template
I currently have some code which when you press the submit button, a marker
I'm using Zend_Search_Lucene, the PHP port of Java Lucene. I currently have some code
I have some code which I'm currently using to change the static-IP of a
I have some code that currently checks for minimum and maximum lentgh. I want
Currently, I have some code as follows template<typename Type> Type* getValue(std::string name, bool tryUseGetter
I have some python code that currently performs expensive computation by performing the computation
I am currently messing around with some code for an advertising network, i have
I'm currently refactoring some Javascript code we have and amongst other things I've changed

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.