Question

currently I switch from Java to C++ and this is giving me a hard time (but lots of new experience ^^). I’m writing some data-transfer-objects which contain configurations for my program. I’ve written some classes and now I want to have a class which behaves like a container.

Here’s a header for the container:

class MyContainer{

public:
MyContainer();
virtual ~MyContainer();

Config getConfig(TypeEnum type) {
    switch (type) {
    case ATYPE:
        return config_a;
    case BTYPE:
        return config_b;
    default:
        break;
    }

}

ConfigA config_a;
    ConfigB config_b;
};

The configs have some data in it and are derived from another config-file.

And here is the C++-Source:

 MyContainer::MyContainer(){
  ConfigA config_a(int c = 1);
  ConfigB config_b(double b = 2.1);
  this->config_a = config_a;
  this->config_b = config_b;
}

There are several problems I think. But the main question for me is:
How can I get those configs in this container to share it to other modules of my program? I have tried to make config_a to a pointer but I always get error-messages that these types won’t match.

 this->config_a = &config_a; //If ConfigA config_a; was ConfigA *config_a; instead

If you have another minute for me then please tell me if the getConfig-Method could work like this.

And if there’s another topic for this then please share. Thanks.

Answer 1

1. If you write ConfigA configA in your header, the configA is automatically allocated during the allocation of the container class. So you don’t have to initialize it like following:

   ConfigA config_a(1);
   this->config_a = config_a;
   

   Instead, you can just do the following:

   this->config_a->value = 1;
   

2. There is no need to write:

   ConfigA config_a(int c = 1);
   

   In short words, the mentioned int c = 1 is an operation, which:

   • allocates space on heap for temporary variable c (this may be done when entering the method as well)
   • assigns value to it, which has side effect of returning the right-hand-side value
   • the returned right-hand-side value is applied to the ConfigA constructor.

   To understand this, try the following:

   int a, b, c;
   c = (a = 2) + (b = 8);
   printf("a = %d, b = %d, c = %d\n", a, b, c);
   

3. If you want to pass the configs to another modules, you can choose one of the following solutions:

   a) Accept the configs as references (the config classes have to derive from the same base class):

   ConfigA & configA = dynamic_cast<ConfigA &>(container.get_config(ATYPE));
   

   In this case, container shall return the configs in the following way:

   return this->configA;
   

   But the header shall be modified:

   Config & getConfig(TypeEnum type) { (...)
   

   b) Accept the configs as pointers (same as above)

   ConfigA * configA = dynamic_cast<ConfigA *>(container.get_config(ATYPE));
   

   In this case, container shall return the configs in the following way:

   return &(this->configA);
   

Finally, this is the way I would do it:

class ConfigA
{
private:
    int i;

public:
    int GetI() const { return i; }
    void SetI(int newI) { i = newI; }
};

class ConfigB
{
private:
    float f;

public:
    float GetF() const { return f; }
    void SetF(float newF) { f = newF; }
};

class Config
{
private:
    ConfigA configA;
    ConfigB configB;

public:
    ConfigA & GetConfigA() { return configA; }
    ConfigB & GetConfigB() { return configB; }
};

class AppContext
{
private:
    Config config;

public:
    Config & GetConfig() { return config; }
};

// Somewhere in the code

Config & config = context.GetConfig();
ConfigA & configA = config.GetConfigA();
configA.SetI(44);

The const-correctness is also worth mentioning, but we’ll leave it as an exercise for the OP 😉