Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6956253
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T14:50:42+00:00 2026-05-27T14:50:42+00:00

Currently I’m doing this: foo.js const FOO = 5; module.exports = { FOO: FOO

  • 0

Currently I’m doing this:

foo.js

const FOO = 5;

module.exports = {
    FOO: FOO
};

And using it in bar.js:

var foo = require('foo');
foo.FOO; // 5

Is there a better way to do this? It feels awkward to declare the constant in the exports object.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T14:50:43+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 2:50 pm

    You can explicitly export it to the global scope with global.FOO = 5. Then you simply need to require the file, and not even save your return value.

    But really, you shouldn’t do that. Keeping things properly encapsulated is a good thing. You have the right idea already, so keep doing what you’re doing.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Currently developing an application using the newest version of symfony, obtained through PEAR. This
Currently I have a class that looks like this: public class MyClass : IMyClass
Currently I am debugging the signing of an Android app. And this would be
Currently, I have: <html> <div class=yes1><span><img src=img></span></div> </html> <script> var x = ='yes1' var
Currently i'm having trouble using two functions in my -(void)viewDidLoad , both of these
Currently I am using Amazon Cloudfront to service static objects on my ASP.Net MVC3
Currently I'm doing some unit tests which are executed from bash. Unit tests are
Currently I am using a pretty basic function to pre-load images: function preload(arrayOfImages) {
Currently, my ListViews look like this: How can I achieve that Windows 7 native
Currently i m working on a project where there are users with four roles

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.