Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8468119
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T15:50:38+00:00 2026-06-10T15:50:38+00:00

Currently, I’m using Closure Compiler just on the javascript file. Now I also want

  • 0

Currently, I’m using Closure Compiler just on the javascript file. Now I also want to minify and rename the CSS classes with shorter names.

Is there a way to avoid having to rewrite every jquery CSS string-based selector in my .js file (ie. $('#SomeID') or $('.SomeClass')) to a variable-based selector? Since most of the HTML is actually generated at runtime, I could easily moved the skeleton HTML that’s initially in the page to the .js file and have the document.ready function first put the skeleton HTML needed for the app on the page. Would that avoid the rewriting of the CSS selectors or would the selectors still need to be rewritten as properties of an object?

The doc is here but I didn’t find it clear http://code.google.com/p/closure-stylesheets/#Renaming

Thanks for your suggestions.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T15:50:39+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 3:50 pm

    The short answer to your question is “no there isn’t”.

    Given that you’ve specified that you’re using jQuery selectors here, we can see that any tool for this job would need to rewrite your all three of your HTML, CSS and JS code.

    The JS code in particular will be very tricky, because of the possibility of building the jQuery selectors using substrings – eg $('#prefix_' + suffix). I don’t know if you’ve done that kind of thing or not, but the ability to do it makes it virtually impossible to write a completely reliable tool that can rename your IDs and classes, but still have your JS code work correctly. If your code is relatively simple, it may be possible to write it so that it would work for you, but no-one is going to release a tool for general use that would break so easily.

    In addition, I don’t believe that such a tool would be particularly useful. It sounds like a case of excessive optimisation.

    Optimisation is great — it’s good to make an effort to make your site as fast as possible. But one of the key arts of good optimisation is to optimise the areas where you are slowest. I would be extremely surprised if the major bottleneck in your code is the length of your class names.

    My advice therefore is to spend your time finding out where the real bottlenecks are in your code, and deal with those. The effect is likely be far greater than all the minification efforts you’ve done in total so far.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I want use html5's new tag to play a wav file (currently only supported
Currently It just opens up the xml, but i want to get a dialog
Currently I am using HTML files for parts of my user interface. I display
currently, I`m implementing a map App with Mono4Droid and there I`m using a WebView
Currently i'm having trouble using two functions in my -(void)viewDidLoad , both of these
Currently I am using Amazon Cloudfront to service static objects on my ASP.Net MVC3
Currently, I have a log file of messages in one table in a MySQL
Currently, I am modifying a css document to make a website compatible in IE
Currently I'm using the Jackson JSON Processor to write preference data and whatnot to
Currently playing about with KnockoutJS. Just trying to update an observable array from a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.