Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 902099
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T15:39:44+00:00 2026-05-15T15:39:44+00:00

Currently looking into distributed memory cache solutions, such as Memcached and Microsoft’s AppFabric caching.

  • 0

Currently looking into distributed memory cache solutions, such as Memcached and Microsoft’s AppFabric caching. It seems to me that one of the difficult hurdles in implemented a distributed cache for an application is determining appropriate keys for the hash.

A naive approach is to hard code hash keys in your application so that all instances across all cluster nodes use the same key for the same data.

A slightly less naive approach for SQL select statements would be to perhaps generate an MD5 on the select statement itself. These select statements may be dynamically generated by an ORM, so you’re not stuck with pre-determined keys.

But what if you want to generate keys based on the uniqueness of a delegate in one of you .NET classes? Consider the following:

public class MyExpensiveObject 
{
    MemCachedClient client = new MemCachedClient();

    public static MyExpensiveObject LoadAll()
    {
        MyExpensiveObject cached = client.Get<MyExpensiveObject >(Utility.GetKey<MyExpensiveObject>(LoadAllDelegate));

        if(cached == null)
        {  
            cached = LoadAllDelegate();
            client.Store(Utility.GetKey<MyExpensiveObject>(LoadAllDelegate), cached);
        }

        return cached;
    }

    public static List<MyExpensiveObject> LoadAllDelegate()
    {
       // return a list of all MyObjects from SQL, or wherever
    }
}

public static class Utility
{
    public static string GetKey<TType>(Func<TType> func)
    {
        // How do I do this, such that each delegate returns the same Key value across application instances?

        // I know this won't work, it seems to return same value within an app domain, but different app domains return different value (which I expected)
        return func.GetHashCode().ToString();
    }
}

Is there a way to uniquely identify a delegate such that we know they are the same thing, across app domains? Ideally the solution would work for anonymous functions and lamdas as well.

Am I shooting for the moon? 🙂

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T15:39:45+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 3:39 pm

    Currently, it appears that

    func.GetType().GUID
    

    Is unique per function, but the same between running the application consecutively (start -> stop, and start again).

    I’m going to move forward with that. Please, anyone let me know if I am misguided in my observation.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 468k
  • Answers 468k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I found a solution! I changed my datastore, and added… May 16, 2026 at 2:20 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer My 2 cents. (this function takes size > 26 into… May 16, 2026 at 2:20 am
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Part of urldecode's functionality is to turn + signs into… May 16, 2026 at 2:20 am

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.