Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7183729
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T18:03:10+00:00 2026-05-28T18:03:10+00:00

Currently, our developers unobfuscate the javascript code so they can better QA our code

  • 0

Currently, our developers unobfuscate the javascript code so they can better QA our code in staging before we release to production.

However, sometimes, they forget to obfuscate the code before releasing to production.

I was wondering if there is a way to expire unobfuscated javascript so that, even if the QA developers forget to obfuscate the js it will auto obfuscate the js after a certain time frame (say 12 hours)?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T18:03:11+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 6:03 pm

    Javascript does not obfuscate itself so this question doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.

    Obfuscation is done by a separate tool in the build/release process. What you need is to improve/automate part of the release process to remove the chances of human error in that process. This can either be done with a more rigorous manual process or with more automatation.

    In general, the QA team should be testing the EXACT same code that gets deployed on the final site so if that’s obfuscated, that’s what QA should test. So, first of all, I’d review what QA is doing and why. They should be testing the obfuscated code.

    If QA needs to review the unobfuscated code for any reasons (I can’t think of any likely reasons myself), then they should make their own copy of the code on their own systems that is unobfuscated and should not be putting the unobfuscated code anywhere in the release process.

    Lastly, it sounds like you would benefit from building an automated release process that does the obfuscation and deploys to both the QA test environment and the same process deploys to your production servers. That guarantees that obfuscation is in place and that QA is testing the exact same bits that would go to production when it’s released.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Me and several other developers are currently cleaning up our legacy code base, mostly
Currently our developent enviroment consists of a Dev server, a Staging server and a
We've been using Trac for a while now for our developers only. However we
I'm currently on the project where we are developing a designer that our developers
Our workflow currently has developers working on locally hosted copies of our web application
We are currently using VSS for version control. Quite few of our developers are
We currently have .Net developers and the company is wanting our development team to
I'm one of the mobile software developers in our company, and currently we plan
We have a small 3 developer team that is currently using Subversion for our
We currently have developed an application using WCF. Our clients make connections to different

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.