Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 334267
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T10:02:18+00:00 2026-05-12T10:02:18+00:00

Currently, we serialize user’s session object into database but the object changed too much

  • 0

Currently, we serialize user’s session object into database but the object changed too much lately so we decide to redesign this process. We all agree that we can’t serialize the whole object and we need to save it field by field. There are 2 proposals,

  1. Store all fields in a map and serialize the map.
  2. Use ObjectOutputStream.putFields().

We don’t see much difference between these 2 approaches. The #1 uses familiar map interface and it’s easier for everyone to use. The #2 provides the convenient methods like fields.get("confirmed", false) etc.

We tend to go with #1. Anyone know any other benefits of #2?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T10:02:18+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 10:02 am

    readFields and putFields have the advantage that you can start off using the default serialisation, and only add the boilerplate when you need it.

    A Map will produce smaller streams if used once, but a stream that stores lots of these object will be smaller if it uses readFields/putFields. This is because there is a one time overhead describing the format of the stream.

    Note you should always call defaultReadObject/readFields at the start of readObject and defaultWriteObject/putFields at the start of writeObject. Unfortunately this is not checked.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 179k
  • Answers 179k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Only sprintf returns a printable value. printf prints the value… May 12, 2026 at 3:46 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer The problem comes from the combination Firefox/Asp.Net. When you manually… May 12, 2026 at 3:46 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If you develop an application that you want to distribute… May 12, 2026 at 3:46 pm

Related Questions

Currently, we serialize user's session object into database but the object changed too much
I currently work for a social networking website. My boss recently had the idea
I'm trying to get the {smartassembly} .NET obfuscator to work with my system. I
I'm working on a set of classes that will be used to serialize to
I have a website where the login info is optionally saved in a cookie

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.