Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 283213
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 12, 20262026-05-12T05:21:16+00:00 2026-05-12T05:21:16+00:00

Currently what i am doing for transaction management is: Connection connection = getConnection(); connection.setAutoCommit(false);

  • 0

Currently what i am doing for transaction management is:

Connection connection = getConnection();
connection.setAutoCommit(false);
updateTableX ( connection, ... );
updateTableY ( connection, ... );
connection.commit();
closeConnection();

I would like to know, if it is possible to avoid closing the connection in my ‘updateTableX’ method. Because if someone accidentally closes the connection then my updateTableY will not be having the connection and it will throw the exception.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-12T05:21:16+00:00Added an answer on May 12, 2026 at 5:21 am

    Just discipline. In general, methods shouldn’t try to take responsibility for closing things passed into them as parameters – with the exception of situations where you create a new object to wrap an existing one.

    The way to avoid closing the connection in updateTableX is just to make sure you don’t put a call to close() into the code. This is no different than any other bug really. How do you stop updateTableX from arbitrarily updating a different table, or throwing an exception, or doing anything else it’s not meant to? Code reviews, unit tests, integration tests, manual testing etc…

    I mean you could write a Connection implementation which wraps another connection and proxies all the methods through except close() but it sounds like a waste of time – if you don’t trust the developers involved not to close the connection, do you trust them to get the rest of the code right?

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I am currently doing something like this: myFunc(tracer); function tracer(message:String):void{ trace(message); } function myFunc(callback:Function):void{
Well, the question kinda nails it down. I'm currently doing something like this: using
I'm currently doing a project in C# working with windows forms. During the course
I'm currently doing some last-measure optimizations, mostly for fun and learning, and discovered something
I am currently doing this, but I am doing something wrong :): <Style TargetType={x:Type
I'm currently doing the following as part of my iPhone application NSArray *paths =
I am currently doing some network programming and had a couple questions concerning timeouts.
I'm currently doing this query to find the guy who makes the most calls:
I am currently doing some kind of reporting system.the figures, tables, graphs are all
I'm currently doing a project where I have to interact with a circuit I

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.