Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7002075
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 27, 20262026-05-27T20:52:59+00:00 2026-05-27T20:52:59+00:00

Declaration inside the class: Integer operator+ (const Integer& right); Definition outside the class: Integer

  • 0

Declaration inside the class:
Integer operator+ (const Integer& right);

Definition outside the class:

Integer operator+ (const Integer& left, const Integer& right)
{
    return left ;
}

What sense does it make for the compiler to enforce different number arguments in declaration and definition?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-27T20:52:59+00:00Added an answer on May 27, 2026 at 8:52 pm

    You declared two different operator+ there. The correct out-of-class definition would be this:

    Integer Integer::operator+(const Integer& right)
    {
        return *this;
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have the following function defined inside my linked list class. The declaration in
Given a declaration like this: class A { public: void Foo() const; }; What
A using declaration does not seem to work with an enum type: class Sample{
This function declaration gives me errors: ostream& operator<<(ostream& os, hand& obj); The errors are:
In the following code I have placed anonymous structures inside of my class declaration
This declaration causes an overflow in VBA: Const OVERFLOWS As Long = 10 *
I would like to define inside a class a constant which value is the
What is the best way to get a global variable inside a class? I
I have a couple questions. Are all functions inside of a class member functions?
I am trying to declare and use a class B inside of a class

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.