Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 949707
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 15, 20262026-05-15T23:26:38+00:00 2026-05-15T23:26:38+00:00

Defining a column to be a primary in table on SQL Server – will

  • 0

Defining a column to be a primary in table on SQL Server – will this make inserts slower?

I ask because I understand this is the case for indexes.

The table has millions of records.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-15T23:26:39+00:00Added an answer on May 15, 2026 at 11:26 pm

    No, not necessarily! Sounds counter-intuitive, but read this quote from Kim Tripp’s blog post:

    Inserts are faster in a clustered
    table
    (but only in the “right”
    clustered table) than compared to a
    heap. The primary problem here is that
    lookups in the IAM/PFS to determine
    the insert location in a heap are
    slower than in a clustered table
    (where insert location is known,
    defined by the clustered key). Inserts
    are faster when inserted into a table
    where order is defined (CL) and where
    that order is ever-increasing.

    So actually, having a good clustered index (e.g. on a INT IDENTITY column, if ever possible) does speed things up – even insert, updates and deletes!

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 530k
  • Answers 530k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer i'm not using the malsup plugin, but if i'm right,… May 16, 2026 at 11:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I come up with this solution: $(function() { $('.a').live('mouseover', function(e)… May 16, 2026 at 11:36 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer Could it be that if you have multi byte characters,… May 16, 2026 at 11:36 pm

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Related Questions

Many databases have a hidden primary key column. MySQL implements this as _rowid. In
I've read a lot about defining custom error messages in SQL Server (I'm using
I am defining this class: function GMap(map, marker, geocoder) { this.map = map; this.marker
I have a table defining ranges, e.g.: START | END | MAP 1 |
I've crossed posted this in the FNH Google Group but here's the scoop: I
I wish to DELETE the data from a table before performing an INSERT INTO,
I have two table Part and SubPart. Part table has general fields like id,
When defining a local inner class, is it safe to access local variables of
I'm dynamically defining a module name from an argument passed on the cli, for
That is, without defining a specific 'width' amount for each individual item. As in,

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.