Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 6340055
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 24, 20262026-05-24T19:45:58+00:00 2026-05-24T19:45:58+00:00

Despite having read Programming in Scala several times, I still often finds important Scala

  • 0

Despite having read “Programming in Scala” several times, I still often finds important Scala constructs that were not explained in the book, like

@uncheckedVariance
@specialized

and other strange constructs like

new { ... }  // No class name!

and so on.

I find this rather frustrating, considering that the book was written by the Scala “inventor” himself, and others.

I tried to read the language specification, but it’s made for academics, rather than practicing programmers. It made my head spin.

Is there a website for “Everything “Programming in Scala” Didn’t Tell You” ?

There was the daily-scala Blog, but it died over a year ago.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-24T19:45:59+00:00Added an answer on May 24, 2026 at 7:45 pm

    Currently, we’re working on a central documentation site for scala-lang.org. We’re hoping that this solves a lot of the documentation issues that new users face. More details on this effort can be found at http://heather.miller.am/blog/2011/07/improving-scala-documentation/, but in summary…

    Believe it or not, there are a lot of documents that the Scala team has produced but which simply aren’t in HTML or are otherwise difficult to find. Such as Martin’s new Collections API, his document on Arrays, or Adriaan’s on Type Constructor Inference.

    One goal of such a site is to collect all of this documentation in one place, in a searchable, organized, and easy-to-navigate format.

    Another goal is to collect excellent community documentation out there, and to put it in the same place as well. For that, we are actively looking for quality (article/overview-like) material with maintainers. Examples include the Scala Style Guide, and Daniel Spiewak’s Scala for Java Refugees.

    Yet another goal is to make it easy for contributors to participate- so the site is built from RST source, which will live in a documentation-only github repo at https://github.com/scala/scala-docs.

    So, in short, something better is on it’s way, and contributors are very welcome to participate.

    EDIT: http://docs.scala-lang.org is now live.

    Several documents considered to be rather detailed or even obscure are already available. This includes all “Scala Improvement Proposals” (the proposals produced when new language features are suggested, and which are usually very detailed, and written by the implementers themselves). Also available is the entire glossary from Programming in Scala, Scala cheatsheets, amongst many other documents. The bottom-line of the site is to be community-focused and contribution-friendly– so, free, and totally open. Suggested topics to cover are also welcome.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I'm asking this question despite having read similar but not exactly what I want
Despite having studied Domain Driven Design for a long time now there are still
Is it possible to change settings in Eclipse so that, despite having known errors,
Despite having very little Linux experience, I'm too enticed by VPS (and too sick
Unfortunately, despite having tried to learn regex at least one time a year for
I've got the DTD for OFX 1.03 (their latest version despite having developed and
Despite me working with C# ( Windows Forms ) for years, I'm having a
I wrote a setter and getter method following Apple's conventions and noticed that despite
I have a loop variable that does not appear to be getting garbage collected
I'm still trying to figure out how the revision numbering works with bzr, despite

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.