Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3315604
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T22:22:11+00:00 2026-05-17T22:22:11+00:00

Development teams are often plagued by builds in version control being transiently broken. The

  • 0

Development teams are often plagued by builds in version control being transiently broken. The entire team’s productivity can come to a halt while trying recover from a build broken by one person.

Is there software that would allow hosting Git in a way that prevents breaking builds in version control by not accepting commits that fail to pass tests in the first place? The usage scenario could for example look as follows:

  • The software runs on a server that continuously pulls revisions from Git repositories that developers have published.
  • For each pulled revision, the software builds the revision and tests if it passes the unit tests.
    • If it passes the tests, the revision is merged into the “stable” branch.
    • If it doesn’t pass the tests, it is rejected and the revision is not merged into the “stable” branch. The developer is forced to correct the revision and resubmit it.
  • Developers by default pull from the “stable” branch that should never be broken—in the sense that tests do not fail—and are more productive as they spend less time being blocked by broken builds. And the usefulness of such a system grows with the team size.

A few notes:

  • Git’s pre-commit hooks and similar are not satisfactory in this case. The solution should be automatic and enforced on the server side for each commit.
  • Looking for a solution that has been implemented and thought out as far as possible, instead of writing a system like this myself from scratch.
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T22:22:11+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 10:22 pm

    I think this is more a build server feature that ties into a VCS such as Git. TeamCity does have support for this, but I’ve not tried it so I can’t comment on how good it actually is.

    http://www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/features/delayed_commit.html

    The Hudson guys have been discussing it for a while, but I’ve yet to see it in a release.

    http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Designing+pre-tested+commit

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

My team builds reusable libraries for other (internal) software development teams. We use FlexBuilder
My development team uses source safe at a very basic level. We're moving into
Our development team work with Borland C++ Builder 6 and CodeGear C++ Builder 2007
My development team is moving to branching soon - we've been cursed with SourceSafe
Say a development team includes (or makes use of) graphic artists who create all
Assume your .NET-based development team is already using the following set of tools in
Part of the development team I work with has been given the challenge of
In the past my development team we have mostly done waterfall development against an
I'm working with my ASP.NET development team to try and create better (i.e. cleaner)
I am responsible for a small development team and we deal mainly with database

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.