Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8674893
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 12, 20262026-06-12T19:49:06+00:00 2026-06-12T19:49:06+00:00

@dfa = Time.new @type_me = gets @i = 0 def type pause_duration = 2

  • 0
@dfa = Time.new
@type_me = gets
@i = 0
def type
  pause_duration = 2
  start_time = Time.new
  until Time.new == start_time + pause_duration
  puts "#{start_time + pause_duration} || #{Time.new}"
  end
  print @type_me[@i]
  @i += 1
  type
end

type

Why isn’t Time.new ever equal to start_time + pause_duration?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-12T19:49:07+00:00Added an answer on June 12, 2026 at 7:49 pm

    You’re just not likely to get them with the same microsecond precision in the loop. Use >= instead.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have a very peculiar problem:(not using web.config) DefaultFacebookApplication dfa=new DefaultFacebookApplication(); dfa.AppId = ...;
I have a question about DFA minimization. So I've used very well known techniques
I'm trying to parse the link 'bit.ly/KATlrT' out of : asdfs asdf as dfa
I realize that the DFA is countable since the DFA for specific language is
I'm implementing a DFA as close as I can to the formal definition as
It is well-known how one gets from an NFA for a regular language to
I make a minimised DFA, to use key value style coding, I used dictionary.
I have heard that DFA can be simulated by Loop and NFA can be
I have a compiler homework question that wants me to draw a DFA for
I'm looking to implement a DFA minimizer in my lexer, but I can't seem

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.