Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8377919
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 9, 20262026-06-09T15:47:48+00:00 2026-06-09T15:47:48+00:00

Disclaimer again: I’m a Clojure newbie. Thanks for the help. My previous question (

  • 0

Disclaimer again: I’m a Clojure newbie. Thanks for the help.

My previous question ( Clojure's defrecord – how to use it?) resulted in a working data structure and methods: https://gist.github.com/3353281

Question: Is there a way to avoid passing in my data structure to all of the methods that operate on it? Or is this the way you’re supposed to do it in idiomatic Clojure?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-09T15:47:49+00:00Added an answer on June 9, 2026 at 3:47 pm
    1. Data should always be passed explicitly.
    2. If you’re using nested assocs, you should probably be using assoc-in instead.
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Disclaimer: this question is driven by my personal curiosity more than an actual need
Disclaimer, new to programming, working my way through C++ Prime Plus 6th ed. I'm
Again disclaimer disclaimer still learning C# and OOP generally so I hope you'll be
Disclaimer: this question is purely informational and does not represent an actual problem I'm
disclaimer: I must use a microsoft access database and I cannot connect my app
Disclaimer: This question is not about fixing visual studio So, I've used VSS for
DISCLAIMER: Don't use ::feof() as your loop condition. For example, see the answer to:
Disclaimer This is not strictly a programming question, but most programmers soon or later
( Disclaimer: This question is not specific to ASP.NET) I have a control which
( DISCLAIMER : This is NOT a question about understanding the difference between abstract

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.