Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3302350
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 17, 20262026-05-17T20:50:33+00:00 2026-05-17T20:50:33+00:00

Disclaimer: I’m looking for a Python 2.6 solution, if there is one. I’m looking

  • 0

Disclaimer: I’m looking for a Python 2.6 solution, if there is one.

I’m looking for a function that returns a single value when passed a single value, or that returns a sequence when passed multiple values:

>>> a = foo(1)
2
>>> b, c = foo(2, 5)
>>> b
3
>>> c
6

To be clear, this is in an effort to make some function calls simply look nicer than:

a, = foo(1)

or

a = foo(1)[0]

Right now, the inelegant solution is something along these lines:

def foo(*args):
    results = [a + 1 for a in args]
    return results if len(results) > 1 else results[0]

Is there any syntactic sugar (or functions) that would make this feel cleaner? anything like the following?

def foo(*args):
    return *[a + 1 for a in args]
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-17T20:50:33+00:00Added an answer on May 17, 2026 at 8:50 pm

    You can easily write a function scalify that returns the element from the list if the list has only one element, i.e. it tries to make it a scalar (hence the name).

    def scalify(l):
        return l if len(l) > 1 else l[0]
    

    Then you can use it in your functions like so:

    def foo(*args):
        return scalify([a + 1 for a in args])
    

    This will do the trick, but I’m with those who suggest you don’t do it. For one reason, it rules out iterating over the result unless you know you passed in at least two items. Also, if you have a list, you have to unpack the list when calling the function, losing its “listness,” and you know you may not get a list back. These drawbacks seem to me to overshadow any benefit you may see to the technique.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

DISCLAIMER: At my place of work we are aware that, as none of us
Disclaimer: Cocoa newbie here. I wrote an app with a Cocoa GUI that acts
( Disclaimer: I changed/obfuscated some of the variable/table/column names here for security reasons. Please
Disclaimer: I apologize if this is not an appropriate question to ask here... I
Disclaimer: I'm a total newbie at graph theory and I'm not sure if this
Disclaimer : I'm an SQL newb and this is for a class, but I
Disclaimer: I have no experience in signing the files and this is my first
(Disclaimer: I don't know what the C++ standard might say about this..I know, I'm
Disclaimer : This is a very basic question, but keep in mind I come

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.