Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7594819
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 30, 20262026-05-30T21:30:58+00:00 2026-05-30T21:30:58+00:00

Do I need to worry about performance in the case below and save the

  • 0

Do I need to worry about performance in the case below and save the result of the expensive call, or does the compiler recognise it can do the expensive call once?

String name;
if (object.expensiveCall() != null) {
  name = object.expensiveCall().getName();
}
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-30T21:31:00+00:00Added an answer on May 30, 2026 at 9:31 pm

    The compiler will not (in general) do the call just once as it may have side effects, or may be volatile in its result – it couldn’t possibly know when you wanted it to ignore a second call and when you wanted it to actually make the call again. You need to save the result:

    final ExpensiveCallResult nullableResult = object.expensiveCall();
    String name;
    if (nullableResult != null) {
      name = nullableResult.getName();
    }
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Please assume that I do not need to worry about development time and costs:
Do I need to worry about managing the size of html5 localStorage, or will
Do one need to worry about using set_new_handlers in conjunction with smart or auto
need ask you about some help. I have web app running in Net 2.0.
Need some help about with Memcache. I have created a class and want to
Need to call a filter function on some options based on a radio selected
Need a function that takes a character as a parameter and returns true if
Need a way to allow sorting except for last item with in a list.
Need to an expression that returns only things with an I followed by either
Need to locate the following pattern: The letter I followed by a space then

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.