Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7778959
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 1, 20262026-06-01T18:31:45+00:00 2026-06-01T18:31:45+00:00

Do we need to close StringIO objects after usage in Ruby in order to

  • 0

Do we need to close StringIO objects after usage in Ruby in order to free resources, like we do with the real IO objects?

obj = StringIO.new "some string"
#...
obj.close # <--- Do we need to close it?

Refining my question

Closing File object is necessary because it will close the file descriptor. The number of opened files is limited in the OS, and that’s why it is necessary to close File. But, if I understand correctly, StringIO is an abstraction in memory. Do we need to close it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-01T18:31:47+00:00Added an answer on June 1, 2026 at 6:31 pm
    • StringIO#close does not free any resources or drop its reference to the accumulated string. Therefore calling it has no effect upon resource usage.

    • Only StringIO#finalize, called during garbage collection, frees the reference to the accumulated string so that it can be freed (provided the caller does not retain its own reference to it).

    • StringIO.open, which briefly creates a StringIO instances, does not keep a reference to that instance after it returns; therefore that StringIO’s reference to the accumulated string can be freed (provided the caller does not retain its own reference to it).

    • In practical terms, there is seldom a need to worry about a memory leak when using StringIO. Just don’t hang on to references to StringIO once you’re done with them and all will be well.


    Diving into the source

    The only resource used by a StringIO instance is the string it is accumulating. You can see that in stringio.c (MRI 1.9.3); here we see the structure that holds a StringIO’s state:

    static struct StringIO *struct StringIO {
        VALUE string;
        long pos;
        long lineno;
        int flags;
        int count;
    };
    

    When a StringIO instance is finalized (that is, garbage collected), its reference to the string is dropped so that the string may be garbage collected if there are no other references to it. Here’s the finalize method, which is also called by StringIO#open(&block) in order to close the instance.

    static VALUE
    strio_finalize(VALUE self)
    {
        struct StringIO *ptr = StringIO(self);
        ptr->string = Qnil;
        ptr->flags &= ~FMODE_READWRITE;
        return self;
    }
    

    The finalize method is called only when the object is garbage collected. There is no other method of StringIO which frees the string reference.

    StringIO#close just sets a flag. It does not free the reference to the accumulated string or in any other way affect resource usage:

    static VALUE
    strio_close(VALUE self)
    {   
        struct StringIO *ptr = StringIO(self);
        if (CLOSED(ptr)) {
            rb_raise(rb_eIOError, "closed stream");
        }
        ptr->flags &= ~FMODE_READWRITE;
        return Qnil;
    }
    

    And lastly, when you call StringIO#string, you get a reference to the exact same string that the StringIO instance has been accumulating:

    static VALUE
    strio_get_string(VALUE self)
    {   
        return StringIO(self)->string;
    }
    

    How to leak memory when using StringIO

    All of this means that there is only one way for a StringIO instance to cause a resource leak: You must not close the StringIO object, and you must keep it around longer than you keep the string you got when you called StringIO#string. For example, imagine a class having a StringIO object as an instance variable:

    class Leaker
    
      def initialize
        @sio = StringIO.new
        @sio.puts "Here's a large file:"
        @sio.puts
        @sio.write File.read('/path/to/a/very/big/file')
      end
    
      def result
        @sio.string
      end
    
    end
    

    Imagine that the user of this class gets the result, uses it briefly, and then discards it, and yet keeps a reference to the instance of Leaker. You can see that the Leaker instance retains a reference to the result via the un-closed StringIO instance. This could be a problem if the file is very large, or if there are many extant instance of Leaker. This simple (and deliberately pathological) example can be fixed by simply not keeping the StringIO as an instance variable. When you can (and you almost always can), it’s better to simply throw away the StringIO object than to go through the bother of closing it explicitly:

    class NotALeaker
    
      attr_reader :result
    
      def initialize
        sio = StringIO.new
        sio.puts "Here's a large file:"
        sio.puts
        sio.write File.read('/path/to/a/very/big/file')
        @result = sio.string
      end
    
    end
    

    Add to all of this that these leaks only matter when the strings are large or the StringIO instances numerous and the StringIO instance is long lived, and you can see that explicitly closing StringIO is seldom, if ever, needed.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I need to know because I have to explicitly close some remote resources that
I need to close confirm box after some timeout. So can i do that?
I need to close some streams when my Java EE app is undeployed to
After opening an iframe, I sometimes need to close it. Thus far, I just
Does SqlDataAdapter close the SqlConnection after the Fill() function or do I need close
I need to close the pop-window which is triggered from 3rd party site after
I need to close the colorbox iframe that overlays the website with an onclick
For my web application I need to close the child window whenever the parent
I have gtk.Window and I need to catch closure. I need to close the
I have my code as a jsFiddle . i need to close the previous

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.