Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 574993
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 13, 20262026-05-13T13:53:26+00:00 2026-05-13T13:53:26+00:00

Do you think it’s better to always make protected class members an auto-implemented protected

  • 0

Do you think it’s better to always make protected class members an auto-implemented protected property to keep isolation or make it protected field is enough?

protected bool test { get; set; }

or

protected bool test;
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-13T13:53:26+00:00Added an answer on May 13, 2026 at 1:53 pm

    Generally, you should use autoproperties – this allow you to easily add verification, or anything else you need later on. This is especially important if the protected member will be used by classes outside your assembly, as adding such code won’t break your contract with them, whereas changing a field to a method or property will.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I think I have found a bug when setting or getting the Me.Top property
I think that I have a quite strange question. I am using a class
Think about doing this: import matplotlib.pyplot as plt plt.plot(x_A,y_A,'g--') plt.plot(x_B,y_B,'r-o') plt.show() How would you
Think I have an integer array like this: a[0]=60; a[1]=321; a[2]=5; now I want
Think my problem is I am trying to sum a count in the same
Think about the following: Your ISP offers you a dynamic ip-address (for example 123.123.123.123).
Think: tiling my emacs window with eshells, a la xmonad. Is this possible? I
I think that handlers in android are tools to get different objects that are
I think I've figured out the problem. I'm using a IP webcam stream, doing
I think I have a basic understanding of this, but am hoping that someone

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.