Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8121937
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 6, 20262026-06-06T05:40:01+00:00 2026-06-06T05:40:01+00:00

Does anybody know how to write an extension function returning a ParallelQuery in PLINQ?

  • 0

Does anybody know how to write an extension function returning a ParallelQuery in PLINQ?

More specifically, I have the following problem: I want to perform a transformation within a PLINQ query that needs an engine, whose creation is costly and which cannot be accessed concurrently.

I could do the following:

var result = source.AsParallel ().Select ( (i) => { var e = new Engine (); return e.Process(i); } )

Here, the engine is created once per item, which is too expensive.

I want the engine to be created once per thread.

With Aggregate, I can come close to what I want with something like

// helper class: engine to use plus list of results obtained in thread so far
class EngineAndResults {
   public Engine engine = null;
   public IEnumerable<ResultType> results;
}

var result = source.AsParallel ().Aggregate (

   // done once per block of items (=thread),
   // returning an empty list, but a new engine
   () => new EngineAndList () {
       engine = new Engine (),
       results = Enumerable.Empty<ResultType> ()
   },

   // we process a new item and put it to the thread-local list,
   // preserving the engine for further use
   (engineAndResults, item) => new EngineAndResults () {
       engine = engineAndResults.engine,
       results = Enumerable.Concat (
           engineAndResults.results,
           new ResultType [] { engineAndResults.engine.Process (item) }
       )
   },

   // tell linq how to aggregate across threads
   (engineAndResults1, engineAndResults2) => new EngineAndResults () {
       engine = engineAndResults1.engine,
       results = Enumerable.Concat (engineAndResults1.results, engineAndResults2.results)
   },

   // after all aggregations, how do we come to the result?
   engineAndResults => engineAndResults.results
);

As you can see, I misuse the accumulator to carry an engine per thread. The problem here is that PLINQ in the end aggregates the results into a single IEnumerable, which causes the threads to be synchronized. This is not very nice if I want to append another PLINQ extension afterwards.

I would appreciate something like

   var result = source.AsParallel ()
                  .SelectWithThreadwiseInitWhichIAmLookingFor (
                       () => new Engine (),
                       (engine, item) => engine.Process (item)
              )

Does anybody have any idea how to achieve this?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-06T05:40:03+00:00Added an answer on June 6, 2026 at 5:40 am

    You could use ThreadLocal<T> to do this. Something like:

    var engine = new ThreadLocal<Engine>(() => new Engine());
    var result = source.AsParallel()
                       .Select(item => engine.Value.Process(item));
    
    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does anybody know how I could write a function, that was able to create
I want to write C in s-expressions and use compile-time macros. Does anybody know
Does anybody know the case when [NSFileVersion unresolvedConflictVersionsOfItemAtURL:] returns more then 1 versions?
Does anybody know how to refresh button Image Icons? The problem is: I'm making
Does anybody know how I can write cardImage1.BorderStyle = BorderStyle.Fixed3D; without having to explicitly
Does anybody know if it's possible to write the code in the catch block
I write at least a billion PHP while loops a day. Does anybody know
I have a 2 part question. First, as the title says, does anybody know
Does anybody know if there is a shortcut for the following statement in PHP?
Does anybody know how can I send an object, to be more specific a

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.