Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 8428205
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 10, 20262026-06-10T04:59:20+00:00 2026-06-10T04:59:20+00:00

Does anyone know if there are studies done that show the performance overhead of

  • 0

Does anyone know if there are studies done that show the performance overhead of using javascript libraries (other than the obvious of their download time) vs using just basic javascript? The libraries are so huge these days and I was curious.

From my computer science degree it seems it should have growth n. (in other words linear).

In computer science terms this is non threatening but how does it actually effect page loading time and page performance in milliseconds? I know CPU is an issue, RAM, and so on. But are there any test performed that can gauge these sorts of things?

I know another factor is libraries are often optimized to do much the same thing you’d be coding by hand in a less optimized fashion but also libraries have overhead and not all of that functionality will be used.

Edit:
I found this that seems to answer my question thoroughly even though it started out about something else:
When to use Vanilla JavaScript vs. jQuery?

“As the comments are quick to point out (and I agree with 100%) the statements above refer to benchmarking code. A ‘native’ JavaScript solution (assuming it is well written) will outperform a jQuery solution that accomplishes the same thing in nearly every case (I’d love to see an example otherwise). jQuery does speed up development time, which is a significant benefit which I do not mean to downplay. It facilitates easy to read, easy to follow code, which is more than some developers are capable of creating on their own.

In my opinion then, the answer depends on what you’re attempting to achieve. If, as I presumed based on your reference to performance benefits, you’re after the best possible speed out of your application, then using jQuery introduces overhead every time you call $(). If you’re going for readability, consistency, cross browser compatibility, etc, then there are certainly reasons to favor jQuery over ‘native’ JavaScript.”

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-10T04:59:22+00:00Added an answer on June 10, 2026 at 4:59 am

    This is a good question! Next to the download time of the library itself, most of the frameworks are not doing very much, which means they do not delay page showing up or something.

    JQuery’s $.css method, which makes it easy to style elements can be become a performance bottleneck if you need to trigger this very often and operating directly on the style object is much faster.

    I my opinion is better to do more with plain javascript, the more you have to gain high performance. For normal stuff like ajax requests, menu-fading and so on the performance of all the frameworks I have ever used is enough, and coding itself speeds up in turn.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does anyone know there have any other way that (by not using json_encode and
Does anyone know if there are new binaries for the castle logging facility using
Does anyone know if there is an alternative to using attributes on C# properties
Does anyone know how to read a x.properties file in Maven. I know there
Does anyone know if there is a way to generate different code in the
Does anyone know if there's a short-hand or convient way of disabling all of
Does anyone know if there have been any changes in Azure publish to allow
Does anyone know if there is some type of tool, preferably a Firefox add
Does anyone know if there are any (ideally free) alternatives to SilkTest for automated
Does anyone know if there's a Flash (ActionScript) library for providing back button support?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.