Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 234117
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T20:09:32+00:00 2026-05-11T20:09:32+00:00

Does anyone know of an implementation of a lock free hash table in C#?

  • 0

Does anyone know of an implementation of a lock free hash table in C#? Or can anyone confirm for a fact that at least reads on a HashTable are thread-safe?

Edit:

I can read the documentation, but it’s unclear.

“It is thread safe for multi-thread use when only one of the threads perform write (update) operations.”

So, the question is, if I have multiple threads, and they all could write to the hashtable, I would use the writerlock. However, those same threads also read from the hashtable. Do I need a readerlock on the reads?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-11T20:09:33+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 8:09 pm

    Reads are thread-safe until the collection is modified.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does anyone know of a List implementation that has a constant time get(int index)
Does anyone know of any websites, or (preferably) downloadable packages that you can use
Does anyone know where I can find an implementation of an algorithm to convert
Does anyone know about a fast OrderedSet implementation for python that: remembers insertion order
Does anyone know where I can find a Stream splitter implementation? I'm looking to
Does anyone know why the java jdk implementation of hashtable does not rehash the
Does anyone know if it is possible to do lock-free programming in Haskell? I'm
Does anyone know of a python library that has DTW implementation? mlpy seems to
Does anyone know of a scientific/mathematical library in Java that has a straightforward implementation
Does anyone know of an existing ruby implementation of a read/write lock - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Readers-writer_lock

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.