Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 120831
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T03:52:25+00:00 2026-05-11T03:52:25+00:00

Does anyone know why std::queue, std::stack, and std::priority_queue don’t provide a clear() member function?

  • 0

Does anyone know why std::queue, std::stack, and std::priority_queue don’t provide a clear() member function? I have to fake one like this:

std::queue<int> q; // time passes... q = std::queue<int>();  // equivalent to clear() 

IIRC, clear() is provided by everything that could serve as the underlying container. Is there a good reason to not have the container adaptors provide it?

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T03:52:25+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 3:52 am

    Well, I think this is because clear was not considered a valid operation on a queue, a priority_queue or a stack (by the way, deque is not and adaptor but a container).

    The only reason to use the container adaptor queue instead of the container deque is to make it clear that you are performing only queue operations, and no other operations. (from the sgi page on queue)

    So when using a queue, all you can do is push/pop elements; clearing the queue can be seen as a violation of the FIFO concept. Consequently, if you need to clear your queue, maybe it’s not really a queue and you should better use a deque.

    However, this conception of things is a little narrow-minded, and I think clearing the queue as you do is fair enough.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Ask A Question

Stats

  • Questions 117k
  • Answers 117k
  • Best Answers 0
  • User 1
  • Popular
  • Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to approach applying for a job at a company ...

    • 7 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    How to handle personal stress caused by utterly incompetent and ...

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team

    What is a programmer’s life like?

    • 5 Answers
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer What makes you think people always have their browser window… May 11, 2026 at 10:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer If the application is running in the background as a… May 11, 2026 at 10:45 pm
  • Editorial Team
    Editorial Team added an answer I found a complete list for all g++'s on this… May 11, 2026 at 10:45 pm

Related Questions

Does anyone know why std::queue, std::stack, and std::priority_queue don't provide a clear() member function?
For example, suppose I have a class: class Foo { public: std::string& Name() {
I have always wondered why you cannot use locally defined classes as predicates to
I am trying to call the internal Windows NT API function NtOpenProcess. I know
Does anyone know why Microsoft does not ship a numeric text box with its

Trending Tags

analytics british company computer developers django employee employer english facebook french google interview javascript language life php programmer programs salary

Top Members

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.