Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 3425678
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 18, 20262026-05-18T06:37:22+00:00 2026-05-18T06:37:22+00:00

Does compiler optimization cause a problem with code like this? Specifically, can the auto-increments

  • 0

Does compiler optimization cause a problem with code like this? Specifically, can the auto-increments be replied upon to evaulate in the correct order?

uint result = (array[i++] << 16) | (array[i++] << 8) | array[i++];
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-18T06:37:23+00:00Added an answer on May 18, 2026 at 6:37 am

    Yes; this is specified.

    The spec says:

    Operands in an expression are
    evaluated from left to right. For
    example, in F(i) + G(i++) * H(i),
    method F is called using the old value
    of i, then method G is called with the
    old value of i, and, finally, method H
    is called with the new value of i.
    This is separate from and unrelated to
    operator precedence.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When i gone through my compiler(starcore,scc) optimization options, i can see one dead code
I was wondering if there is a possible optimization where the compiler does not
In forward referencing language such as c#, how does the compiler handle this? What
Consider the code below. I don't understand why my GCC compiler does not try
Possible Duplicate: Does const-correctness give the compiler more room for optimization? During the last
Anyone know this compiler feature? It seems GCC support that. How does it work?
What's going on when the assignment statement executed at Line 4 , does compiler
Possible Duplicate: Does the compiler continue evaluating an expression where all must be true
How does virtual functions work behind the scenes in Inheritance ? Does the compiler
On VC++, why does the compiler only pad struct when non-char datatypes are used?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.