Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • Home
  • SEARCH
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 137577
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 11, 20262026-05-11T07:07:41+00:00 2026-05-11T07:07:41+00:00

Does dependency injection mean that you don’t ever need the ‘new’ keyword? Or is

  • 0

Does dependency injection mean that you don’t ever need the ‘new’ keyword? Or is it reasonable to directly create simple leaf classes such as collections?

In the example below I inject the comparator, query and dao, but the SortedSet is directly instantiated:

public Iterable<Employee> getRecentHires() {     SortedSet<Employee> entries = new TreeSet<Employee>(comparator);     entries.addAll(employeeDao.findAll(query));     return entries; } 
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. 2026-05-11T07:07:41+00:00Added an answer on May 11, 2026 at 7:07 am

    Just because Dependency Injection is a useful pattern doesn’t mean that we use it for everything. Even when using DI, there will often be a need for new. Don’t delete new just yet.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does the fact that Rails have an MVC approach mean that is has dependency
Does dependency injection potentially cause large overhead? I would imagine so, especially if the
Does anyone know how to have dependency injection work with linq2sql. Heres my situation..
How do I determine the dependencies of a .NET application? Does Dependency Walker work
In a nutshell: I want to do the same thing Dependency Walker does. Is
Does anyone know a good online resource about using SQL Server 2005 dependency cache
I'm struggling to understand Dependency Properties in Silverlight 2. Does anybody have a good
We're trying to track down some .Net assembly dependency problems. On Windows XP, does
I have been looking at various dependency injection frameworks for .NET as I feel
Does Google force employees who have offers from Facebook to leave immediately?

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.