Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 1033187
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 16, 20262026-05-16T14:11:39+00:00 2026-05-16T14:11:39+00:00

Does Haskell have an equivalent of Alice’s ability to bind a variable to a

  • 0

Does Haskell have an equivalent of Alice’s ability to bind a variable to a future?

val a = spawn foo;

where foo is some function.

I know Haskell supports channels and threads; I’m hoping for syntax as natural as Alice’s to bind a value to a future and spawn a thread to calculate it without having to deal with the details.

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 3 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-16T14:11:39+00:00Added an answer on May 16, 2026 at 2:11 pm

    You can use par from Control.Parallel as in

    a `par` f a b c
    where
      a = foo
    

    This is a hint to the runtime that a could be evaluated in another thread.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

I have some Haskell code that does work correctly on an infinite list, but
Does Haskell standard library have a function that given a list and a predicate,
I am starting to test Haskell for linear algebra. Does anyone have any recommendations
Does haskell-mode or some alternative package offer something akin to the wonderful inferior-haskell-type inside
Does some basic list operation in Haskell(e.g. ghc) are optimized equivalently to their imperative
I think I may have asked this on Haskell-Cafe at some point, but damned
I have been learning about various functional languages for some time now including Haskell,
Does Haskell have a method for determining the number of CPU cores present on
Why does haskell require multiple rewrite rules depending on the function composition technique and
I'm wondering why Scala does not have an IO Monad like Haskell. So, in

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.