Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 9208451
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: June 18, 20262026-06-18T00:37:16+00:00 2026-06-18T00:37:16+00:00

Does it make sense to have an async.reduce if all I do in the

  • 0

Does it make sense to have an async.reduce if all I do in the iterator function is an http-request to the same host (+ scraping in the request’s callback)? I’m asking because the maximum TCP connections to the same host at one time seems to be one (i.e by using console.log in my code, it seems it is only after the scraping finishes in one iteration, that another http-request is made, regardless of how long it takes to receive a response from the web server).

  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-06-18T00:37:17+00:00Added an answer on June 18, 2026 at 12:37 am

    Solved it myself. I didn’t know that async.reduce processes the iterations in series, not in parallel.

    Source: https://github.com/caolan/async#reducearr-memo-iterator-callback

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

When managing shader's, does it make sense to have all of them compiled and
Why does it make sense to have Runtime Exceptions UnChecked (as opposed to if
I have two questions. Does it make sense when I have to choice of
Given that I have a custom PHP error handler already, does it make sense
Ok, question does not really make sense. Here is the situation. I have legacy
Does is make sense to have a collection as an association class? For example,
Similar question to, Does it make sense to have multiple tomcat instances on the
Does it make sense to have such functions defined let squash12 (e:('a*('b*'c) )) =
Does it make sense to have a @OneToOne member contain a @ForiegnKey annotation. @Entity
Does it make sense to have an annotated (@Controller) Abstract class in Spring MVC

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.