Sign Up

Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.

Have an account? Sign In

Have an account? Sign In Now

Sign In

Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.

Sign Up Here

Forgot Password?

Don't have account, Sign Up Here

Forgot Password

Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.

Have an account? Sign In Now

You must login to ask a question.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.

Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.

Sign InSign Up

The Archive Base

The Archive Base Logo The Archive Base Logo

The Archive Base Navigation

  • SEARCH
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
Search
Ask A Question

Mobile menu

Close
Ask a Question
  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Feed
  • User Profile
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Buy Points
  • Users
  • Help
  • Buy Theme
  • SEARCH
Home/ Questions/Q 7088609
In Process

The Archive Base Latest Questions

Editorial Team
  • 0
Editorial Team
Asked: May 28, 20262026-05-28T07:49:18+00:00 2026-05-28T07:49:18+00:00

Does it make sense to overwrite get_by_key_name with another function that uses memcache to

  • 0

Does it make sense to overwrite get_by_key_name with another function that uses memcache to save on database queries? Like below? In this example the memcache key consists of only the entity key_name just to make it simple…

class Entity(db.Model):
   @classmethod
   def get_by_key_name(cls, key_name):
     entity = memcache.get(key_name)
     if entity is not None:
       return entity
     else:
       entity = cls.__super__.get_by_key_name(key_name)
       memcache.add(key_name, entity, 3600)
       return entity
  • 1 1 Answer
  • 0 Views
  • 0 Followers
  • 0
Share
  • Facebook
  • Report

Leave an answer
Cancel reply

You must login to add an answer.

Forgot Password?

Need An Account, Sign Up Here

1 Answer

  • Voted
  • Oldest
  • Recent
  • Random
  1. Editorial Team
    Editorial Team
    2026-05-28T07:49:19+00:00Added an answer on May 28, 2026 at 7:49 am

    A better and neater solution would be to use NDB, which has built in support for memcache and instance memory caching.

    • 0
    • Reply
    • Share
      Share
      • Share on Facebook
      • Share on Twitter
      • Share on LinkedIn
      • Share on WhatsApp
      • Report

Sidebar

Related Questions

Does it make sense to use .NET DataSets even in applications that use a
Does it make sense that if the Text on a TextBox is databound to
does it make sense to use an Filecache when using Sqlite as Database ?
Does it make sense, having all of the C#-managed-bliss, to go back to Petzold's
Does it make sense to use SQL Server Compact for a desktop application? How
Does it make sense to use interfaces for your domain object factories by default,
Does it make sense to create a constant for the value of a penny?
Does it make sense to obsfucate Javascript? The only clear benefits I can see
Does it make sense to use RIA Services as a service provider to an
When does it make sense to use Loop fission/distribution if I am compiling for

Explore

  • Home
  • Add group
  • Groups page
  • Communities
  • Questions
    • New Questions
    • Trending Questions
    • Must read Questions
    • Hot Questions
  • Polls
  • Tags
  • Badges
  • Users
  • Help
  • SEARCH

Footer

© 2021 The Archive Base. All Rights Reserved
With Love by The Archive Base

Insert/edit link

Enter the destination URL

Or link to existing content

    No search term specified. Showing recent items. Search or use up and down arrow keys to select an item.